ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2004
Attitudes on euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide and terminal sedation--a survey of the members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine.
Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disparity in attitudes regarding assisted dying among physicians and the general public in Japan.BMC medical ethics · 2025Article
- Medical students' and residents' views on euthanasia.BMC medical ethics · 2023Article
- Killing Kira, Letting Tom Go?-An Empirical Study on Intuitions Regarding End-of-Life Decisions in Companion Animals and Humans.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2022Article
- Physician-assisted Suicide in Serbia.Iranian journal of public health · 2018Article
- An Ethical Review of Euthanasia and Physician-assisted Suicide.Iranian journal of public health · 2017Article
- Physical compared to mental diseases as reasons for committing suicide: a retrospective study.BMC palliative care · 2016Article
- In-service documentation tools and statements on palliative sedation in Germany--do they meet the EAPC framework recommendations? A qualitative document analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016Article
- Article
- Palliative care professionals' willingness to perform euthanasia or physician assisted suicide.BMC palliative care · 2015Article
- [Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide : Attitudes of physicians and nurses].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2015Article
- Article
- A national survey of Italian physicians' attitudes towards end-of-life decisions following the death of Eluana Englaro.Intensive care medicine · 2011Article
- Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2011Article
- Doctor-cared dying instead of physician-assisted suicide: a perspective from Germany.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2010Article
- [Sedation in palliative medicine: Guidelines for the use of sedation in palliative care : European Association for Palliative Care (EAPC)].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2010Review
- Accessing the ethics of complex health care practices: would a "domains of ethics analysis" approach help?HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2010Article
- [A wish to hasten death : what is behind it].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2010Review
- Attitudes toward assisted death amongst Portuguese oncologists.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2010Article
- Palliative sedation until death: an approach from Kant's ethics of virtue.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2008Article
- Attitudes towards terminal sedation: an empirical survey among experts in the field of medical ethics.BMC palliative care · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDue to recent legislations on euthanasia and its current practice in the Netherlands and Belgium, issues of end-of-life medicine have become very vital in many European countries. In 2002, the Ethics Working Group of the German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP) has conducted a survey among its physician members in order to evaluate their attitudes towards different end-of-life medical practices, such as euthanasia (EUT), physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and terminal sedation (TS).
methodsAn anonymous questionnaire was sent to the 411 DGP physicians, consisting of 14 multiple choice questions on positions that might be adopted in different hypothetical scenarios on situations of "intolerable suffering" in end-of-life care. For the sake of clarification, several definitions and legal judgements of different terms used in the German debate on premature termination of life were included. For statistical analysis t-tests and Pearson-correlations were used.
resultsThe response rate was 61% (n = 251). The proportions of the respondents who were opposed to legalizing different forms of premature termination of life were: 90% opposed to EUT, 75% to PAS, 94% to PAS for psychiatric patients. Terminal sedation was accepted by 94% of the members. The main decisional bases drawn on for the answers were personal ethical values, professional experience with palliative care, knowledge of alternative approaches, knowledge of ethical guidelines and of the national legal frame.
conclusionsIn sharp contrast to similar surveys conducted in other countries, only a minority of 9.6% of the DGP physicians supported the legalization of EUT. The misuse of medical knowledge for inhumane killing in the Nazi period did not play a relevant role for the respondents' negative attitude towards EUT. Palliative care needs to be stronger established and promoted within the German health care system in order to improve the quality of end-of-life situations which subsequently is expected to lead to decreasing requests for EUT by terminally ill patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15679025What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.