Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15679025›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2004

Attitudes on euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide and terminal sedation--a survey of the members of the German Association for Palliative Medicine.

H C Müller-Busch, F S Oduncu, S Woskanjan, E Klaschik

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Physician-assisted Suicide in Serbia.Iranian journal of public health · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. In-service documentation tools and statements on palliative sedation in Germany--do they meet the EAPC framework recommendations? A qualitative document analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2016
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Euthanasia attitude; A comparison of two scales.Journal of medical ethics and history of medicine · 2011
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Accessing the ethics of complex health care practices: would a "domains of ethics analysis" approach help?HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues · 2010
    Article
  17. [A wish to hasten death : what is behind it].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2010
    Review
  18. Attitudes toward assisted death amongst Portuguese oncologists.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2010
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

H C Müller-BuschDepartment of Anesthesiology, Pain Therapy and Palliative Care, GK Havelhöhe, D-14089 Berlin, Germany.
F S Oduncu
S Woskanjan
E Klaschik

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDue to recent legislations on euthanasia and its current practice in the Netherlands and Belgium, issues of end-of-life medicine have become very vital in many European countries. In 2002, the Ethics Working Group of the German Association for Palliative Medicine (DGP) has conducted a survey among its physician members in order to evaluate their attitudes towards different end-of-life medical practices, such as euthanasia (EUT), physician-assisted suicide (PAS), and terminal sedation (TS).

methodsAn anonymous questionnaire was sent to the 411 DGP physicians, consisting of 14 multiple choice questions on positions that might be adopted in different hypothetical scenarios on situations of "intolerable suffering" in end-of-life care. For the sake of clarification, several definitions and legal judgements of different terms used in the German debate on premature termination of life were included. For statistical analysis t-tests and Pearson-correlations were used.

resultsThe response rate was 61% (n = 251). The proportions of the respondents who were opposed to legalizing different forms of premature termination of life were: 90% opposed to EUT, 75% to PAS, 94% to PAS for psychiatric patients. Terminal sedation was accepted by 94% of the members. The main decisional bases drawn on for the answers were personal ethical values, professional experience with palliative care, knowledge of alternative approaches, knowledge of ethical guidelines and of the national legal frame.

conclusionsIn sharp contrast to similar surveys conducted in other countries, only a minority of 9.6% of the DGP physicians supported the legalization of EUT. The misuse of medical knowledge for inhumane killing in the Nazi period did not play a relevant role for the respondents' negative attitude towards EUT. Palliative care needs to be stronger established and promoted within the German health care system in order to improve the quality of end-of-life situations which subsequently is expected to lead to decreasing requests for EUT by terminally ill patients.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelEuthanasiaSuicide, AssistedFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePhysiciansSurveys and QuestionnairesDeath and EuthanasiaEmpirical Approach

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.