Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15677718›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

NMR screening and crystal quality of bacterially expressed prokaryotic and eukaryotic proteins in a structural genomics pipeline.

Rebecca Page, Wolfgang Peti, Ian A Wilson, Raymond C Stevens, Kurt Wüthrich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 88 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Differential reactivity of closely related zinc(II)-binding metallothioneins from the plant Arabidopsis thaliana.Journal of biological inorganic chemistry : JBIC : a publication of the Society of Biological Inorganic Chemistry · 2018
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Protein production for structural genomics using E. coli expression.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2014
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Electrospray ionization-induced protein unfolding.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2012
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Rapid, robotic, small-scale protein production for NMR screening and structure determination.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2010
    Article
  18. Benefits of structural genomics for drug discovery research.Infectious disorders drug targets · 2009
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rebecca PageDepartment of Molecular Biology and Joint Center for Structural Genomics, The Scripps Research Institute, 10550 North Torrey Pines Road, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA.
Wolfgang Peti
Ian A Wilson
Raymond C Stevens
Kurt Wüthrich
Joint Center for Structural Genomics · USScripps Research Institute · US

Funding

JOINT CENTER FOR STRUCTURAL GENOMICSP50GM062411 · NIGMS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI WILSON, IAN A · 2000 to 2004
$32.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM062411NIGMS NIH HHS P50 GM062411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the Joint Center for Structural Genomics, one-dimensional (1D) 1H NMR spectroscopy is routinely used to characterize the folded state of protein targets and, thus, serves to guide subsequent crystallization efforts and to identify proteins for NMR structure determination. Here, we describe 1D 1H NMR screening of a group of 79 mouse homologue proteins, which correlates the NMR data with the outcome of subsequent crystallization experiments and crystallographic structure determination. Based on the 1D 1H NMR spectra, the proteins are classified into four groups, "A" to "D." A-type proteins are candidates for structure determination by NMR or crystallography; "B"-type are earmarked for crystallography; "C" indicates folded globular proteins with broadened line shapes; and "D" are nonglobular, "unfolded" polypeptides. The results obtained from coarse- and fine-screen crystallization trials imply that only A- and B-type proteins should be used for extensive crystallization trials in the future, with C and D proteins subjected only to coarse-screen crystallization trials. Of the presently studied 79 soluble protein targets, 63% yielded A- or B-quality 1D 1H NMR spectra. Although similar yields of crystallization hits were obtained for all four groups, A to D, crystals from A- and B-type proteins diffracted on average to significantly higher resolution than crystals produced from C- or D-type proteins. Furthermore, the output of refined crystal structures from this test set of proteins was 4-fold higher for A- and B-type than for C- and D-type proteins.

Indexed as

GenomicsProtein ConformationAnimalsCrystallography, X-RayMiceMolecular Sequence DataNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID15677718
PMCPMC548552
OpenAlexW2013340413

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.