Trial reportAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2005
Infliximab improves signs and symptoms of psoriatic arthritis: results of the IMPACT 2 trial.
Trial report in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 202 papers, 33 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
202 citing papers in PubMed, 33 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 715 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluation of the risk of heart failure with tumour necrosis factor inhibitors: A large-scale meta-analysis in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases.Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV · 2025Pooled it
- Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors for psoriatic arthritis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Short term efficacy of biological treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Archives of dermatological research · 2024Pooled it
- Interleukin-receptor antagonist and tumour necrosis factor inhibitors for the primary and secondary prevention of atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024Pooled it
- Effectiveness and safety of biological and target synthetic drugs treatment for psoriatic arthritis: a systematic review with network meta-analysis.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2024Pooled it
- Evaluating the efficacy of biologics with and without methotrexate in the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: a network meta-analysis.RMD open · 2024Pooled it
- Systematic literature review and network meta-analysis of therapies for psoriatic arthritis on patient-reported outcomes.BMJ open · 2023Pooled it
- Effects of bDMARDs on quality of life in patients with psoriatic arthritis: meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Systematic review of the use of CRP in clinical trials for psoriatic arthritis: a concern for clinical practice?RMD open · 2022Pooled it
- The incidence of opportunistic infections in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with biologic and targeted synthetic agents: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Brazilian Society of Rheumatology 2020 guidelines for psoriatic arthritis.Advances in rheumatology (London, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Management of particular clinical situations in psoriatic arthritis: an expert's recommendation document based on systematic literature review and extended Delphi process.Rheumatology international · 2021Pooled it
- Does current evidence on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs for psoriatic arthritis reinforce an effect on radiographic progression? Results from a systematic review and meta-analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2021Pooled it
- Comparative effectiveness of guselkumab in psoriatic arthritis: results from systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2021Pooled it
- Efficacy of local injection therapy for heel pain in rheumatic inflammatory diseases: A systematic review.Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2020Pooled it
- Fourteen small molecule and biological agents for psoriatic arthritis: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of biologics in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review and network meta-analysis.RMD open · 2020Pooled it
- A Systematic Review With Network Meta-Analysis of the Available Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Disease Domains.Frontiers in medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Time until onset of action when treating psoriatic arthritis: meta-analysis and novel approach of generating confidence intervals.Rheumatology international · 2019Pooled it
142 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate further in a phase III, double blind trial the efficacy of infliximab in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), as observed in the smaller IMPACT trial.
methods200 patients with active PsA unresponsive to previous treatment were randomised to infusions of infliximab 5 mg/kg or placebo at weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, and 22. Patients with inadequate response entered early escape at week 16. The primary measure of clinical response was ACR20. Other measures included Psoriatic Arthritis Response Criteria (PsARC), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), and dactylitis and enthesopathy assessments.
resultsAt week 14, 58% of patients receiving infliximab and 11% of those receiving placebo achieved an ACR20 response and 77% of infliximab patients and 27% of placebo patients achieved PsARC (both p<0.001). Among the 85% of patients with at least 3% body surface area psoriasis involvement at baseline, 53/83 (64%) patients receiving infliximab had at least 75% improvement in PASI compared with 2/87 (2%) patients receiving placebo at week 14 (p<0.001). These therapeutic effects were maintained through the last evaluation (week 24). Fewer infliximab patients than placebo patients had dactylitis at week 14 (18% v 30%; p = 0.025) and week 24 (12% v 34%; p<0.001). Fewer infliximab patients (22%) than placebo patients (34%) had active enthesopathy at week 14 (p = 0.016); corresponding figures at week 24 were 20% and 37% (p = 0.002). Infliximab was generally well tolerated, with a similar incidence of adverse events in each group.
conclusionsInfliximab 5 mg/kg through 24 weeks significantly improved active PsA, including dactylitis and enthesopathy, and associated psoriasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.