ArticleThe Journal of physiology2005
Compound-specific Na+ channel pore conformational changes induced by local anaesthetics.
Article in The Journal of physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- Potentiation of local anesthetic activity of neosaxitoxin with bupivacaine or epinephrine: development of a long-acting pain blocker.Neurotoxicity research · 2009Trial
- Structural basis for antiarrhythmic drug interactions with the human cardiac sodium channel.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019Article
- Evaluation of the cardiotoxicity and resuscitation of rats of a newly developed mixture of a QX-314 analog and levobupivacaine.Journal of pain research · 2017Article
- Comparison of Gating Properties and Use-Dependent Block of Nav1.5 and Nav1.7 Channels by Anti-Arrhythmics Mexiletine and Lidocaine.PloS one · 2015Article
- Exploring the structure of the voltage-gated Na+ channel by an engineered drug access pathway to the receptor site for local anesthetics.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2014Article
- Lidocaine reduces the transition to slow inactivation in Na(v)1.7 voltage-gated sodium channels.British journal of pharmacology · 2011Article
- A molecular switch between the outer and the inner vestibules of the voltage-gated Na+ channel.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2010Article
- Transient inactivation of the ventral tegmental area selectively disrupts the expression of conditioned place preference for pup- but not cocaine-paired contexts.Behavioral neuroscience · 2009Article
- Novel molecular determinants in the pore region of sodium channels regulate local anesthetic binding.Molecular pharmacology · 2009Article
- Pharmacogenetics and anti-arrhythmic drug therapy: a theoretical investigation.American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology · 2007Article
- A conserved ring of charge in mammalian Na+ channels: a molecular regulator of the outer pore conformation during slow inactivation.The Journal of physiology · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Upon prolonged depolarizations, voltage-dependent Na+ channels open and subsequently inactivate, occupying fast and slow inactivated conformational states. Like C-type inactivation in K+ channels, slow inactivation is thought to be accompanied by rearrangement of the channel pore. Cysteine-labelling studies have shown that lidocaine, a local anaesthetic (LA) that elicits depolarization-dependent ('use-dependent') Na+ channel block, does not slow recovery from fast inactivation, but modulates the kinetics of slow inactivated states. While these observations suggest LA-induced stabilization of slow inactivation could be partly responsible for use dependence, a more stringent test would require that slow inactivation gating track the distinct use-dependent kinetic properties of diverse LA compounds, such as lidocaine and bupivacaine. For this purpose, we assayed the slow inactivation-dependent accessibility of cysteines engineered into domain III, P-segment (mu1: F1236C, K1237C) to sulfhydryl (MTSEA) modification using a high-speed solution exchange system. As expected, we found that bupivacaine, like lidocaine, protected cysteine residues from MTSEA modification in a depolarization-dependent manner. However, under pulse-train conditions where bupivacaine block of Na+ channels was extensive (due to ultra-slow recovery), but lidocaine block of Na+ channels was not, P-segment cysteines were protected from MTSEA modification. Here we show that conformational changes associated with slow inactivation track the vastly different rates of recovery from use-dependent block for bupivacaine and lidocaine. Our findings suggest that LA compounds may produce their kinetically distinct voltage-dependent behaviour by modulating slow inactivation gating to varying degrees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.