Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15677530›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical pathology2005

Amyloid in the cardiovascular system: a review.

I Kholová, H W M Niessen

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical pathology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Microvascular obstruction in cardiac amyloidosis.European journal of heart failure · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Quantitative technetium pyrophosphate and cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected cardiac amyloidosis.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Medin aggregation causes cerebrovascular dysfunction in aging wild-type mice.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Coronary arterial vasculature in the pathophysiology of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2019
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Application of confocal laser scanning microscopy for the diagnosis of amyloidosis.Virchows Archiv : an international journal of pathology · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Proteotoxicity and cardiac dysfunction.Circulation research · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

I KholováDepartment of Pathology, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, De Boelelaan 1117, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
H W M Niessen
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The cardiovascular system is a common target of amyloidosis. This review presents the current clinical and diagnostic approach to amyloidosis, with the emphasis on cardiovascular involvement. It summarises recent nomenclature, classification, and pathogenesis of amyloidosis. In addition, non-invasive possibilities are discussed, together with endomyocardial biopsies in the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. Finally, recent advances in treatment and prognostic implications are presented.

Indexed as

AgingAlgorithmsAmyloidosisCardiovascular DiseasesDiagnostic ErrorsHeart DiseasesHumansImmunohistochemistryMicroscopy, ElectronMyocardiumPrognosis

Identifiers

PMID15677530
PMCPMC1770576
OpenAlexW2047577462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.