Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15676046›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2005

The influence of guidelines on the use of statins: analysis of prescribing trends 1998-2002.

M Teeling, K Bennett, J Feely

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00509717 (Implementation of a Pharmacy-Intervention to Enhance Prescription and Use of Lipid-Lowering Drugs. A Randomized Trial.), which is not on this map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00509717 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2006, after this paper: background citation

Implementation of a Pharmacy-Intervention to Enhance Prescription and Use of Lipid-Lowering Drugs. A Randomized Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorRadboud University Medical CenterRan2006 to 2008Enrolled70ConditionsCardiovascular DiseasesArmsintensive implementation programme, control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

M TeelingDepartment of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College/St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. teelingm@tcd.ie
K Bennett
J Feely
St. James's Hospital · IE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo monitor statin prescribing trends over time in order to determine whether prescribers were influenced by study results and/or clinical guidelines in terms of type and dosage of statin prescribed.

methodsThe GMS (General Medical Services) prescription database in Ireland was used to identify a cohort of patients, prescribed statins, in order to investigate prescribing trends from January 1998-December 2002. Statin prescribing rates for patients with ischaemic heart disease and diabetes were compared with rates in the general GMS population. Logistic regression analysis was used in patients with ischaemic heart disease and diabetes and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals presented.

resultsIncreased statin prescribing over time was noted (test for linear trend P < 0.0001). Pravastatin was the most frequently prescribed, followed by atorvastatin; simvastatin and fluvastatin showed lower rates of prescribing. Atorvastatin showed the greatest increased rate over time. An increase in the overall dose prescribed (test for trend P < 0.01) was chiefly due to increases in pravastatin dose, but doses were still below those recommended from clinical trials. Statins were prescribed more frequently in patients with ischaemic heart disease and diabetes, 44% (95% CI 43-45%) compared with the total GMS population, 7.7% (95% CI 7.6-7.8%), by December 2002. However, statins were only prescribed to 52% (95% CI 51-53%) of ischaemic heart disease patients and 40% (95% CI 39-41%) of patients with diabetes by December 2002. Patients aged 45-64 years were more likely to receive statins, compared with those aged 65 years and older.

conclusionThese findings suggest that the beneficial effects of statins shown in clinical studies may not be achieved in practice.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdolescentAdultAgedCohort StudiesDiabetes MellitusDrug PrescriptionsFemaleHumansHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsIrelandMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaOdds RatioPractice Patterns, Physicians'Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID15676046
PMCPMC1884758
OpenAlexW2129661419

What OpenQuestion holds

Texttitle and abstract
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.