Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15674944›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005

Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respiratory failure due to severe acute exacerbations of asthma.

F S F Ram, S Wellington, B H Rowe, J A Wedzicha

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01513655 (Home Non Invasive Ventilation), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01513655 phase4unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2013, after this paper: background citation

Home Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV) Treatment for COPD-patients After a NIV-treated Exacerbation

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity Hospital, Gentofte, CopenhagenRan2013 to 2020Enrolled150ConditionsChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Airways Disease, Chronic Hypercapnic Respiratory FailureArmsLTNIV
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 97 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory insufficiency].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
  4. [Noninvasive ventilation in out-of-hospital emergency medicine].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014
    Review
  5. Article
  6. [Ventilation strategies for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2012
    Review
  7. Acute lung failure.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2011
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Perioperative medical management of patients with COPD.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2007
    Review
  12. [Non-invasive ventilation].Der Internist · 2006
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

F S F Ram
S Wellington
B H Rowe
J A Wedzicha
St Bartholomew's Hospital · GBUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundNon-invasive positive pressure ventilation (NPPV) has been shown to be effective in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients with acute respiratory failure. However, its role in patients with severe acute asthma is uncertain. The pathophysiologic condition of acute respiratory failure in asthma is in many ways similar to that of acute respiratory failure in COPD. Therefore, there is reason to believe that NPPV could also be successful in patients with severe acute asthma.

objectivesTo determine the efficacy of NPPV in adults with severe acute asthma, in comparison to usual medical care, with respect to mortality, tracheal intubation, changes in blood gases, and hospital length of stay. SEARCH STRATEGY: An initial search for studies was carried out using the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL). Additional searches were carried out on MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Science Citation and web based clinical trials databases. Key journals with web sites were also searched as well as respiratory conference proceedings. Following this, the bibliographies of each randomised controlled trial obtained (and any review articles) were searched for additional studies. The date of the most recent search for trials was May 2004. SELECTION CRITERIA: All data were analysed using RevMan. For continuous variables a weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated for each study outcome. For dichotomous variables relative risk with 95% confidence interval was calculated. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All data was analysed using RevMan. For continuous variables, a weighted mean difference and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was calculated for each study outcome. For dichotomous variables relative risk with 95% confidence interval was calculated. MAIN

resultsFrom an initial search of 696 abstracts, 11 trials were obtained in full text for closer examination. Ten trials were excluded and one included. The one included trial, on 30 patients, showed benefit with NPPV when compared to usual medical care alone, with significant improvements in hospitalisation rate, number of patients discharged from emergency department, percent predicted forced expiratory volume in one minute (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and respiratory rate. AUTHORS'

conclusionsThe application of NPPV in patients suffering from status asthmaticus, despite some interesting and very promising preliminary results, still remains controversial. Large, prospective randomised controlled trials are therefore needed to determine the role of NPPV in status asthmaticus.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAdultAsthmaHumansPositive-Pressure RespirationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRespiratory Insufficiency

Identifiers

PMID15674944
OpenAlexW4236766075

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.