SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Botulinum toxin type A versus anticholinergics for cervical dystonia.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 192 citations in OpenAlex.
- Botulinum toxin type A versus anticholinergics for cervical dystonia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Botulinum Toxin in Movement Disorders: An Update.Toxins · 2021Review
- Long-term quality of life in cervical dystonia after treatment with abobotulinum toxin A: a 2-year prospective study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2018Article
- Clinical Management of Dystonia in Childhood.Paediatric drugs · 2017Review
- The therapeutic usage of botulinum toxin (Botox) in non-cosmetic head and neck conditions - An evidence based review.Saudi pharmaceutical journal : SPJ : the official publication of the Saudi Pharmaceutical Society · 2017Review
- Quality of life in cervical dystonia after treatment with botulinum toxin A: a 24-week prospective study.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2017Article
- Patient considerations in the treatment of cervical dystonia: focus on botulinum toxin type A.Patient preference and adherence · 2015Review
- Treatment of focal dystonia.Current treatment options in neurology · 2012Article
- A patient with tremor, part 2: from diagnosis to treatment.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2011Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCervical dystonia is the most common form of focal dystonia. It is characterized by involuntary posturing of the head and frequently is associated with neck pain. Disability and social withdrawal are common. Most cases are idiopathic and generally cervical dystonia is a life-long disorder. Botulinum toxin Type A (BtA) is now the first line therapy. Before BtA, anticholinergics were the most widely accepted treatment, so it is important to understand how these two treatments compare.
objectivesTo compare the clinical efficacy and safety of BtA versus anticholinergic drugs in the treatment of cervical dystonia. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group trials register (June 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE 1977 to June 2003), EMBASE (1977 to June 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised studies comparing BtA versus any anticholinergic drug for the treatment of cervical dystonia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials. MAIN
resultsWe found only one trial suitable for inclusion and accordingly no meta-analysis was performed. It compared BtA versus trihexyphenidyl in 66 patients with cervical dystonia. Although this was a relatively small trial with short duration, the results can probably be generalized for the population, since the trial appears to be unbiased and produced clear clinically significant results. The results favoured BtA, and the difference was similar in size to that obtained in a systematic review comparing BtA with placebo. BtA was better tolerated. AUTHORS'
conclusionsThe available evidence suggests that BtA injections provide more objective and subjective benefit than trihexyphenidyl to patients with cervical dystonia. We could not draw any conclusions about other anticholinergic drugs. Future trials should explore the role of anticholinergic drugs in patients that do not get benefit with BtA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.