SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Chinese medicinal herbs for acute pancreatitis.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neostigmine for non-mild acute pancreatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Pooled it
- Randomized controlled trial: neostigmine for intra-abdominal hypertension in acute pancreatitis.Critical care (London, England) · 2022Trial
- Lysine acetylation and its role in the pathophysiology of acute pancreatitis.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2025Review
- An overview of current research on the modulation of NLRP3 inflammasome by traditional Chinese medicine to combat acute pancreatitis.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Understanding the treatment of acute pancreatitis and its complications -a database for assessing traditional Chinese medicine use.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- Neostigmine for the treatment of acute pancreatitis: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2023Article
- Article
- New challenges for microRNAs in acute pancreatitis: progress and treatment.Journal of translational medicine · 2022Review
- A Prospective Study of Using Chaihu Shugan Powder Combined withEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022Article
- Perspectives of traditional Chinese medicine in pancreas protection for acute pancreatitis.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017Review
- Chinese Herbal Medicines Attenuate Acute Pancreatitis: Pharmacological Activities and Mechanisms.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2017Review
- Yin-Chen-Hao Tang Attenuates Severe Acute Pancreatitis in Rat: An Experimental Verification ofFrontiers in pharmacology · 2016Article
- Herbal traditional Chinese medicine and its evidence base in gastrointestinal disorders.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015Review
- Evaluating the quality of randomized controlled trials that examine the efficacy of natural health products: a systematic review of critical appraisal instruments.Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2009Article
- Evidence from the Cochrane Collaboration for Traditional Chinese Medicine therapies.Journal of alternative and complementary medicine (New York, N.Y.) · 2009Review
- Protective effect of TribulusAvicenna journal of phytomedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAcute pancreatitis is a relatively common acute abdominal emergency but there is no specific therapy for it. Traditional Chinese medicinal herbs have been used widely for many years in China to treat acute pancreatitis, and several controlled trials have been carried out to investigate their efficacy.
objectivesTo assess the efficacy and safety of traditional Chinese medicinal herbs for acute pancreatitis. SEARCH STRATEGY: The following electronic databases were searched, in September 2002: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2002, MEDLINE, EMBASE, AHMED (Allied and Complementary Medicine Database) and SIGLE (System for Information on Grey Literature). Four Chinese journals and conference proceedings were handsearched. No language restriction was used. The searches were updated in October 2003 (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2003). SELECTION CRITERIA: All randomized controlled trials involving traditional Chinese medicinal herbs in the treatment of acute pancreatitis and published in any language, regardless of whether they were single-blinded, double-blinded, or not blinded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted independently by two reviewers. The methodological quality of trials was evaluated using the Jadad scale plus allocation concealment. MAIN
resultsEleven randomized clinical trials (including a total of 658 participants) were identified in which Chinese medicinal herbs or Chinese medicinal herbs plus routine treatment were compared with routine treatment. All of these trials were published in Chinese and all included inpatients. None of the articles described the method of randomisation. The large heterogeneity of the intervention prevented us from doing a meaningful subgroup analysis. There appeared to be some benefit from Chinese medicinal herbs over control for mortality rates, length of hospital stay and operative intervention but the trials were of low quality and this benefit did not reach statistical significance. AUTHORS'
conclusionsSome Chinese medicinal herbs may work in acute pancreatitis. However, the evidence is too weak to recommend any single herb. Rigorously designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials are required.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.