SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Perphenazine for schizophrenia.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disconnection of drug-response and placebo-response in acute-phase antipsychotic drug trials on schizophrenia? Meta-regression analysis.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019Pooled it
- Perphenazine for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Haloperidol versus first-generation antipsychotics for the treatment of schizophrenia and other psychotic disorders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2015Pooled it
- Perphenazine versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Flupenthixol versus low-potency first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- Antipsychotic medication for early episode schizophrenia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011Pooled it
- Glioblastoma treatment using perphenazine to block the subventricular zone's tumor trophic functions.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2014Review
- Efficacy of amisulpride and olanzapine for negative symptoms and cognitive impairments: An open-label clinical study.Industrial psychiatry journal · 2014Article
- Current approaches to treatments for schizophrenia spectrum disorders, part I: an overview and medical treatments.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2013Review
- Where Does Evidence from New Trials for Schizophrenia Fit with the Existing Evidence: A Case of the Emperor's New Clothes?Schizophrenia research and treatment · 2012Article
- Polymorphism of human cytochrome P450 2D6 and its clinical significance: part II.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2009Article
- Effectiveness of antipsychotics: is the CATIE trial a tsunami?Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerphenazine is an old phenothiazine antipsychotic with a potency similar to haloperidol. It has been used for many years and is popular in the northern European countries and Japan.
objectivesTo examine the clinical effects and safety of perphenazine for those with schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's register (June 2001), references of all included studies and contacted pharmaceutical companies and authors of included studies in order to identify further trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included all randomised controlled trials that compared perphenazine with other treatments for people with schizophrenia and/or schizophrenia-like psychoses. We excluded trials of depot formulations of perphenazine. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently inspected citations and, where possible, abstracts. We ordered papers, inspected and quality assessed them. We extracted data, again working independently. If loss to follow up was greater than 50% we considered results as 'prone to bias'. For dichotomous data we calculated the relative risk (RR), the 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the number needed to treat/harm (NNT/H) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD). MAIN
resultsThe review currently includes 25 studies with 2478 patients, 2285 of whom had been randomised to interventions that were relevant for the review such as perphenazine, other antipsychotic drugs or placebo. The trials were carried out between 1961 and 1993. All but one trial were short term with a duration of between ten days and 12 weeks. Descriptions of allocation and blinding were usually incomplete. Six studies (n=300) compared perphenazine with placebo. Perphenazine was associated with fewer participants leaving the trials early due to relapse or worsening of symptoms (n=84, RR 0.1 CI 0.03 - 0.4, NNT 2 CI 1 to 20). Twenty studies compared perphenazine (n=738) with other antipsychotics (n=1278). Perphenazine seemed as effective as other antipsychotics ('global state unimproved or worse' n=1327, RR 1.0 CI 0.9 to 1.2). We found no clear differences in terms of specific aspects of efficacy, behaviour or tolerability. However, interpretation of findings of the review was limited by poor reporting and the use of 24 different comparator antipsychotics in the 20 trials. AUTHORS'
conclusionsAlthough perphenazine has been randomised for more than 40 years, incomplete reporting and the variety of comparators used make it impossible to draw clear conclusions. At best we can say that perphenazine showed similar effects and adverse events as several of the other pooled antipsychotic drugs. Since perphenazine is a relatively inexpensive and frequently used compound, further trials are justified to clarify the properties of this classical antipsychotic drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.