Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15674373›Full record

ArticleGenes and immunity2005

Transcriptional response signature of human lymphoid cells to staphylococcal enterotoxin B.

C Mendis, R Das, R Hammamieh, A Royaee, D Yang, S Peel, M Jett

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Genes and immunity, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

C MendisDivision of Pathology, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD, USA. mendisc@uwplatt.edu
R Das
R Hammamieh
A Royaee
D Yang
S Peel
M Jett
Walter Reed Army Institute of Research · USGeorgetown University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Two shock-inducing toxins that result in similar eventual outcome of disease were studied to determine host gene expression responses, for correlation of both similar and unique gene patterns. We initially used differential display (DD)-PCR and identified 859 cDNA fragments that were differentially expressed after 16 h of in vitro exposure of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB). Upon further examination using custom cDNA microarrays and RT-PCR analysis, we found unique set of genes to each toxin (SEB or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)), especially at early time periods. By 16 h, there was a convergence of some gene expression responses and many of those genes code for proteins such as proteinases, transcription factors, vascular tone regulators, and respiratory distress. In an attempt to replicate the findings in vivo, monkeys were challenged with SEB and the resultant gene expression responses indicated a pattern typical of SEB exposure when compared to LPS, with a similar outcome. We provide evidence that vastly diverse global gene analysis techniques used in unison can not only effectively identify pathogen-specific genomic markers and provide a solid foundation to mechanistic insights but also explain some of the toxin-related symptoms through gene functions.

Indexed as

AnimalsCells, CulturedEnterotoxinsGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression RegulationHaplorhiniHumansLeukocytesOligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysisenterotoxin B, staphylococcalEnterotoxins

Identifiers

PMID15674373
OpenAlexW2032175628

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.