ArticleGenes and immunity2005
Transcriptional response signature of human lymphoid cells to staphylococcal enterotoxin B.
Article in Genes and immunity, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proinflammatory synergy between protease and superantigen streptococcal pyogenic exotoxins.Infection and immunity · 2025Article
- Comparison of Transcriptional Signatures of Three Staphylococcal Superantigenic Toxins in Human Melanocytes.Biomedicines · 2022Article
- FDA-approved immunosuppressants targeting staphylococcal superantigens: mechanisms and insights.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2017Review
- Staphylococcal Superantigens Spark Host-Mediated Danger Signals.Frontiers in immunology · 2016Review
- Transcriptome characterization of immune suppression from battlefield-like stress.Genes and immunity · 2013Article
- Presymptomatic prediction of sepsis in intensive care unit patients.Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Two shock-inducing toxins that result in similar eventual outcome of disease were studied to determine host gene expression responses, for correlation of both similar and unique gene patterns. We initially used differential display (DD)-PCR and identified 859 cDNA fragments that were differentially expressed after 16 h of in vitro exposure of human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) to staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB). Upon further examination using custom cDNA microarrays and RT-PCR analysis, we found unique set of genes to each toxin (SEB or lipopolysaccharide (LPS)), especially at early time periods. By 16 h, there was a convergence of some gene expression responses and many of those genes code for proteins such as proteinases, transcription factors, vascular tone regulators, and respiratory distress. In an attempt to replicate the findings in vivo, monkeys were challenged with SEB and the resultant gene expression responses indicated a pattern typical of SEB exposure when compared to LPS, with a similar outcome. We provide evidence that vastly diverse global gene analysis techniques used in unison can not only effectively identify pathogen-specific genomic markers and provide a solid foundation to mechanistic insights but also explain some of the toxin-related symptoms through gene functions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.