Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15673747›Full record

ArticleAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2005

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cefpirome in subcutaneous adipose tissue of septic patients.

Robert Sauermann, Georg Delle-Karth, Claudia Marsik, Ilka Steiner, Markus Zeitlinger, Bernhard X Mayer-Helm, Apostolos Georgopoulos, Markus Müller, Christian Joukhadar

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. [Tissue penetration of antibiotics. Does the treatment reach the target site?].Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2014
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Robert SauermannDepartment of Clinical Pharmacology, Division of Clinical Pharmacokinetics, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, 1090 Vienna, Austria.
Georg Delle-Karth
Claudia Marsik
Ilka Steiner
Markus Zeitlinger
Bernhard X Mayer-Helm
Apostolos Georgopoulos
Markus Müller
Christian Joukhadar
Chemotherapy Foundation · USIntensive Care Society · GBMedical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of the present study was to evaluate whether cefpirome, a member of the latest class of broad-spectrum cephalosporins, sufficiently penetrates subcutaneous adipose tissue in septic patients. After the administration of the drug at 2 g, tissue cefpirome concentrations in septic patients (n = 11) and healthy controls (n = 7) were determined over a period of 4 h by means of microdialysis. To assess the antibacterial effect of cefpirome at the target site, the measured pharmacokinetic profiles were simulated in vitro with select strains of Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The tissue penetration of cefpirome was significantly impaired in septic patients compared with that in healthy subjects. For subcutaneous adipose tissue, the area under the concentration-versus-time curve values from 0 to 240 min were 13.11 +/- 5.20 g . min/liter in healthy subjects and 6.90 +/- 2.56 g . min/liter in septic patients (P < 0.05). Effective bacterial growth inhibition was observed in all in vitro simulations. This was attributed to the significantly prolonged half-life in tissue (P < 0.05), which kept the tissue cefpirome levels above the MICs for relevant pathogens for extended periods in the septic group. By consideration of a dosing interval of 8 h, the values for the time above MIC (T > MIC) in tissue were greater than 60% for pathogens for which the MIC was </=4 mg/liter in all septic patients. The present data indicate that cefpirome is an appropriate agent for the treatment of soft tissue infections in septic patients. However, due to the high interindividual variability of the pharmacokinetics of cefpirome in tissue, dosing intervals of not more than 8 h should be preferred to ensure that susceptible bacterial strains are killed in each patient.

Indexed as

Adipose TissueAdultArea Under CurveCefpiromeCephalosporinsChromatography, Micellar Electrokinetic CapillaryColony Count, MicrobialFemaleHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicrodialysisPseudomonas aeruginosaSepsisStaphylococcus aureusCefpiromeCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID15673747
PMCPMC547217
OpenAlexW1980283839

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.