Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15673669›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2005

Differential effects of cerebellar inactivation on eyeblink conditioned excitation and inhibition.

John H Freeman, Hunter E Halverson, Amy Poremba

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Changes in membrane properties of rat deep cerebellar nuclear projection neurons during acquisition of eyeblink conditioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Cerebellar learning mechanisms.Brain research · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Cerebellar-dependent expression of motor learning during eyeblink conditioning in head-fixed mice.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2014
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

John H FreemanDepartment of Psychology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, USA. john-freeman@uiowa.edu
Hunter E Halverson
Amy Poremba
University of Iowa · US

Funding

Neural Mechanisms of Inhibitory Classical ConditioningR01MH065483 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI FREEMAN, JOHN H · 2003 to 2007
$726k
NIMH NIH HHS MH065483NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH065483
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The neural mechanisms underlying excitatory and inhibitory eyeblink conditioning were compared using muscimol inactivation of the cerebellum. In experiment 1, rats were given saline or muscimol infusions into the anterior interpositus nucleus ipsilateral to the conditioned eye before each of four daily excitatory conditioning sessions. Postinfusion testing continued for four more excitatory conditioning sessions. All rats were given a final test session after muscimol infusions. The muscimol infusions inactivated the cerebellar nuclei, lateral anterior lobe, crus I, rostral crus II, and lobule HVI ipsilateral to the conditioned eye. Acquisition of excitatory conditioning was completely prevented by muscimol inactivation. In experiment 2, there were four experimental phases. Phase 1 consisted of excitatory conditioning. In phase 2, rats were given saline or muscimol infusions before conditioned inhibition training. Phase 3 consisted of continued conditioned inhibition training with no drug infusions. In phase 4, all rats received a retardation test in which the inhibitory stimulus was paired with the unconditioned stimulus. Muscimol infusions blocked the expression of conditioned responses during phase 2. However, robust conditioned inhibition was evident in phases 3 and 4. The findings indicate that conditioned excitation and inhibition depend on different mechanisms.

Indexed as

AnimalsAutoradiographyBlinkingBrain StemCerebellar NucleiCerebellumConditioning, ClassicalDeoxyglucoseElectromyographyFunctional LateralityInfusions, ParenteralMaleMuscimolNeural InhibitionRatsRats, Long-EvansDeoxyglucoseMuscimol

Identifiers

PMID15673669
PMCPMC1249522
OpenAlexW2059134863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.