Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15672832›Full record

ReviewTransgenic research2004

Lentiviral transgenesis.

Alexander Pfeifer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Transgenic research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 85 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Gene transfer into cardiac myocytes.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2015
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. New routes for transgenesis of the mouse.Journal of applied genetics · 2012
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Lentiviral transgenesis in livestock.Transgenic research · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Transgenic pigs as models for translational biomedical research.Journal of molecular medicine (Berlin, Germany) · 2010
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Beyond the rat models of human neurodegenerative disorders.Cellular and molecular neurobiology · 2009
    Review
  20. Transgenic mice and their impact on kidney research.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Alexander PfeiferDepartment of Pharmacy, Institute for Pharmacology, Center for Drug Research, Ludwig-Maximilians University, Munich, Germany. alexander.pfeifer@cup.uni-muenchen.de
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transgenic animals are relevant for many fields of modern biomedicine and agriculture. However, the inefficiencies of the presently available techniques--DNA microinjection and retroviral gene transfer--have led to an explosion of costs for transgenics especially in farm animals. The recent success in transferring genes to early embryos of different species (mouse, rat, pig, cattle) by viral vectors derived from lentiviruses, has established lentiviral transgenesis as an exciting alternative to the classical method of DNA microinjection. In addition, lentiviral vectors can be used to transfer genes into embryonic stem cells. Due to its high efficacy and versatility, lentiviral transgenesis should have a big impact on transgenic research.

Indexed as

Animals, Genetically ModifiedGenetic VectorsGene Transfer TechniquesLentivirusAnimalsAnimals, Domestic

Identifiers

PMID15672832
OpenAlexW4231388390

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.