Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15670440›Full record

ArticlePreventing chronic disease2004

Interorganizational relationships within state tobacco control networks: a social network analysis.

Melissa Krauss, Nancy Mueller, Douglas Luke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventing chronic disease, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Interorganizational Networks in Physical Activity Promotion: A Systematic Review.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Rural Health Networks: How Network Analysis Can Inform Patient Care and Organizational Collaboration in a Rural Breast Cancer Screening Network.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An Examination of Two Policy Networks Involved in Advancing Smokefree Policy Initiatives.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2015
    Article
  10. A Social Network Analysis of a Coalition Initiative to Prevent Underage Drinking in Los Angeles County.Proceedings of the ... Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences · 2015
    Article
  11. Article
  12. European national healthy city networks: the impact of an elite epistemic community.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2013
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Melissa KraussCenter for Tobacco Policy Research, Saint Louis University School of Public Health, MO 63104, USA.
Nancy Mueller
Douglas Luke

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionState tobacco control programs are implemented by networks of public and private agencies with a common goal to reduce tobacco use. The degree of a program's comprehensiveness depends on the scope of its activities and the variety of agencies involved in the network. Structural aspects of these networks could help describe the process of implementing a state's tobacco control program, but have not yet been examined.

methodsSocial network analysis was used to examine the structure of five state tobacco control networks. Semi-structured interviews with key agencies collected quantitative and qualitative data on frequency of contact among network partners, money flow, relationship productivity, level of network effectiveness, and methods for improvement.

resultsMost states had hierarchical communication structures in which partner agencies had frequent contact with one or two central agencies. Lead agencies had the highest control over network communication. Networks with denser communication structures had denser productivity structures. Lead agencies had the highest financial influence within the networks, while statewide coalitions were financially influenced by others. Lead agencies had highly productive relationships with others, while agencies with narrow roles had fewer productive relationships. Statewide coalitions that received Robert Wood Johnson Foundation funding had more highly productive relationships than coalitions that did not receive the funding.

conclusionResults suggest that frequent communication among network partners is related to more highly productive relationships. Results also highlight the importance of lead agencies and statewide coalitions in implementing a comprehensive state tobacco control program. Network analysis could be useful in developing process indicators for state tobacco control programs.

Indexed as

Interinstitutional RelationsSmoking PreventionSocial SupportState GovernmentTobacco Use CessationAcademies and InstitutesCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S.Efficiency, OrganizationalFinancing, GovernmentGovernment AgenciesHealth PromotionHumansIndianaMichiganModels, TheoreticalNew York

Identifiers

PMID15670440
PMCPMC1277948

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.