Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15669879›Full record

ReviewDrugs2005

Second-generation antihistamines: actions and efficacy in the management of allergic disorders.

Larry K Golightly, Leon S Greos

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 106 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. AAAAI physician survey: Current antihistamine use in the clinical setting.The journal of allergy and clinical immunology. Global · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pollen respiratory allergy: Is it really seasonal?The World Allergy Organization journal · 2023
    Review
  11. Comparative Study of Chemical Stability of Two HJournal of analytical methods in chemistry · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Effects of inclusion of cetirizine hydrochloride in β-cyclodextrin.Journal of inclusion phenomena and macrocyclic chemistry · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. H1 antihistamines: current status and future directions.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2008
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Larry K GolightlyPharmacy Care Team, University of Colorado Hospital, Denver, Colorado 80262, USA. larry.golightly@uch.edu
Leon S Greos
University of Colorado Denver · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antihistamines are useful medications for the treatment of a variety of allergic disorders. Second-generation antihistamines avidly and selectively bind to peripheral histamine H1 receptors and, consequently, provide gratifying relief of histamine-mediated symptoms in a majority of atopic patients. This tight receptor specificity additionally leads to few effects on other neuronal or hormonal systems, with the result that adverse effects associated with these medications, with the exception of noticeable sedation in about 10% of cetirizine-treated patients, resemble those of placebo overall. Similarly, serious adverse drug reactions and interactions are uncommon with these medicines. Therapeutic interchange to one of the available second-generation antihistamines is a reasonable approach to limiting an institutional formulary, and adoption of such a policy has proven capable of creating substantial cost savings. Differences in overall efficacy and safety between available second-generation antihistamines, when administered in equivalent dosages, are not large. However, among the antihistamines presently available, fexofenadine may offer the best overall balance of effectiveness and safety, and this agent is an appropriate selection for initial or switch therapy for most patients with mild or moderate allergic symptoms. Cetirizine is the most potent antihistamine available and has been subjected to more clinical study than any other. This agent is appropriate for patients proven unresponsive to other antihistamines and for those with the most severe symptoms who might benefit from antihistamine treatment of the highest potency that can be dose-titrated up to maximal intensity.

Indexed as

Histamine H1 AntagonistsAdolescentAdultAnimalsBiological AvailabilityChildChild, PreschoolHalf-LifeHistamineHumansHypersensitivityMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRhinitis, Allergic, PerennialUrticariaHistamineHistamine H1 Antagonists

Identifiers

PMID15669879
OpenAlexW1998743389

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.