ArticleJournal of inherited metabolic disease2004
Improvement of CDG diagnosis by combined examination of several glycoproteins.
Article in Journal of inherited metabolic disease, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Component of oligomeric Golgi complex 1 deficiency leads to hypoglycemia: a case report and literature review.BMC pediatrics · 2021Review
- Screening for congenital disorders of glycosylation in the first weeks of life.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedAssmann, B [added]
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG) represent a family of genetic diseases with broad clinical presentation. Initial diagnosis is currently mainly based on the identification of hyposialylated serum transferrin (TF) by isoelectric focusing (IEF). To improve the diagnosis of known CDG types and to identify so far unknown CDG cases, additional glycoproteins, alpha1-antitrypsin titrypsin (alpha1-AT) and alpha1-antichymotrypsin (alpha1-ACT), were studied. According to the patterns of transferrin, enzyme assays and mutation analysis, 16 patients with various clinical symptoms suspicious for CDG were divided into three groups: group A (n = 6) with confirmed CDG; group B (n = 4) with clear abnormal TF-IEF patterns of unknown origin (all known CDG types were excluded) and group C (n = 6) with borderline TF-IEF patterns; 164 samples served as a control group. Automated IEF of TF, alpha1-AT and alpha1-ACT was carried out using a PhastSystem. CDG patients with glycosylation defects of known origin (group A) and patients with abnormal TF-IEF patterns due to glycosylation defects of as yet unknown origin (group B) showed abnormal IEF patterns of all three glycoproteins. These results confirmed generalized defects of glycosylation. Furthermore, the IEF pattern of alpha1-ACT seems to allow a differentiation between CDG Ia and CDG Ic. However, patients with borderline TF-IEF pattern (group C) showed a normal alpha1-AT-IEF pattern. Four of these six patients also showed a normal alpha1-ACT-IEF pattern; this constellation suggests that CDG can most likely be excluded. In the two remaining patients of group C with a borderline TF-IEF pattern an abnormal pattern of alpha1-ACT-IEF was obtained which needs further investigations. We conclude that the combined investigation of three glycoproteins provides additional information in the diagnostic work-up of patients with possible CDG. The suspicion of CDG in patients with apparent glycosylation defects of unknown origin or borderline TF-IEF pattern can be either substantiated or weakened.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15669673What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.