ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2005
Granisetron versus tropisetron for prophylaxis of acute chemotherapy-induced emesis: a pooled analysis.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- State of the Art Antiemetic Therapy for Cancer Patients.Current oncology reports · 2016Review
- Granisetron versus tropisetron in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after total thyroidectomy.Saudi journal of anaesthesia · 2013Article
- Use of granisetron transdermal system in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a review.Cancer management and research · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This analysis compares the antiemetic efficacy of the 5-HT3-receptor antagonists granisetron and tropisetron in acute chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV). All published randomized studies comparing granisetron with tropisetron in conventionally-dosed, emetogenic chemotherapy are included in this pooled analysis. The target criterion for antiemetic success was 'acute complete response' (complete absence of vomiting in the 24 h after the start of chemotherapy) and the rate of successful treatment reported as 'response rate' (acute complete response rate per patient). Twelve studies were used comprising 810 patients. Comparison between granisetron and tropisetron in patients receiving cisplatin-based therapy showed superiority of granisetron (odds ratio above 1.0) in six out of seven studies. However, this difference did not reach statistical significance. In patients receiving noncisplatin-based therapies, four out of five studies showed an advantage of granisetron over tropisetron with one study showing a significant advantage. Pooled analysis of all studies demonstrated a significant overall advantage for granisetron over tropisetron (p=0.042). This is supported by the individual studies: overall, ten out of the 12 studies analyzed showed an advantage for granisetron, with a 6.4% difference in response rate. This advantage was more pronounced in noncisplatin-based therapy (7.3%), whereas in cisplatin-based therapy, the difference was 5.4%. The overall results of this pooled analysis of cisplatin and noncisplatin-based studies suggest that granisetron has a marginal but clinically potentially relevant statistically significant advantage in efficacy over tropisetron for the control of acute CINV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.