Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15667766›Full record

ReviewThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005

Complex consultations and the 'edge of chaos'.

Andrew D Innes, Peter D Campion, Frances E Griffiths

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Family medicine is complexity medicine.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2024
    Article
  6. "You can't eat scenery": Family medicine, industrialization, and importance of values.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  7. Family medicine has become more complex: New funding model is a welcome first step.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  8. Compression of morbidity is dead; long live compression of morbidity.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. That's irrelevant.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. COGITA network has constructed a glossary of diagnostic reasoning terms.The European journal of general practice · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Coaching for health: holding the curtains so patients can change.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  19. A theoretical framework for multimorbidity: from complicated to chaotic.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  20. Training for leadership.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrew D InnesChurch View Surgery, Hedon, East Yorkshire. a.d.i@btinternet.com
Peter D Campion
Frances E Griffiths

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complexity theory has attracted considerable attention in recent years, both within medicine and in the wider world. Its themes of uncertainty and non-linearity resonate deeply with the experience of working in general practice. Describing the consultation as a complex, adaptive system provides a coherent theoretical basis for understanding the consultation, which has so far been lacking. Understanding the consultation as a complex, adaptive system offers insights into the consultation of that may prove to be of practical use to clinicians.

Indexed as

Decision MakingFamily PracticeNonlinear DynamicsPhysician-Patient RelationsHumans

Identifiers

PMID15667766
PMCPMC1266243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.