ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2005
Impact of UK colorectal cancer screening pilot on primary care.
Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Improving survival in colorectal cancer: what role for general practice?The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013Article
- Demographic, social cognitive and social ecological predictors of intention and participation in screening for colorectal cancer.BMC public health · 2011Article
- Colorectal cancer screening using the faecal occult blood test (FOBt): a survey of GP attitudes and practices in the UK.BMC family practice · 2010Article
- Colorectal cancer screening coverage in Greece. PACMeR 02.01 study collaboration.International journal of colorectal disease · 2007Article
- Bowel cancer screening in England: a qualitative study of GPs' attitudes and information needs.BMC family practice · 2006Article
- Colorectal cancer in primary care.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2006Article
- Colorectal cancer screening awareness among physicians in Greece.BMC gastroenterology · 2006Article
- The impact of computer self-efficacy, computer anxiety, and perceived usability and acceptability on the efficacy of a decision support tool for colorectal cancer screening.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIAArticle
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot has recently been completed to evaluate the feasibility of screening using the faecal occult blood test. Screening will be phased in over the next several years, and it is important to consider the impact on the NHS workforce.
aimTo determine the impact of the UK Colorectal Cancer Screening Pilot on primary care workload. DESIGN OF STUDY: A retrospective survey and prospective audit of general practice staff.
settingGeneral practice.
methodWorkload impact was assessed using a postal questionnaire and a prospective audit of activity in participating practices. Questionnaires were sent to practices that had been involved in the Pilot between 6 weeks and 1 year previously. They were sent to a random sample of 59 practices in Scotland and 60 practices in England between February 2001 and March 2002. Audit forms were sent prospectively to 60 practices involved in the Pilot between May 2001 and September 2002.
resultsSixty-seven per cent of GPs, 82% of practice managers, 69% of practice nurses, and 70% of receptionists responded to the questionnaire. Of 60 practices contacted to take part in the workload audit, 38 returned completed 'workload impact audit' forms. Most practice staff indicated they spent 2% or less of their time during the screening period on Pilot-related activities. Forty per cent of GPs thought that a national colorectal cancer screening programme would substantially impact on the workload in primary care. However, there were variations by country: practice staff in Scotland were more likely to think that it would substantially impact on workload than practice staff in England (44.7% versus 26.6%).
conclusionsThe surveys and audit demonstrate that the Pilot has had a discernible, albeit modest, impact on workload in primary care. Workload of particular significance to primary care personnel includes increases in paperwork, administration, and information provision to patients. The majority of primary care staff support the introduction of a colorectal cancer screening programme. However, there is a strong perception, particularly among GPs, that a national programme of faecal occult blood test screening will impact significantly on workload in primary care, and that primary care-based activities generated through screening should be adequately resourced and remunerated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15667761PMC1266238W2147420987What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.