Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15666173›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of clinical pharmacology2005

Milk thistle and indinavir: a randomized controlled pharmacokinetics study and meta-analysis.

Edward Mills, Kumanan Wilson, Mike Clarke, Brian Foster, Scott Walker, Beth Rachlis, Nick DeGroot, Victor M Montori, Wayne Gold, Elizabeth Phillips and 2 more

Abstract readClinical TrialRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of clinical pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The effects of milk thistle (Silybum marianum) on human cytochrome P450 activity.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2014
    Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Milk Thistle (Current medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Herb-drug interactions: challenges and opportunities for improved predictions.Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals · 2014
    Article
  13. Drug interactions with herbal medicines.Clinical pharmacokinetics · 2012
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Edward MillsFaculty of Health Sciences, Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, HSC-2C12, 1200 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON, L8N 3Z5, Canada. millsej@mcmaster.ca
Kumanan Wilson
Mike Clarke
Brian Foster
Scott Walker
Beth Rachlis
Nick DeGroot
Victor M Montori
Wayne Gold
Elizabeth Phillips
Stephen Myers
Keith Gallicano
Canadian College of Naturopathic Medicine · CAUniversity of Toronto · CAWomen's College Hospital · CAA.S. Watson (Netherlands) · NLCochrane · GBHealth Canada · CAMcMaster University · CAUniversity of Queensland · AUWinnMed · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine whether ingestion of milk thistle affects the pharmacokinetics of indinavir.

methodsWe conducted a three-period, randomized controlled trial with 16 healthy participants. We randomized participants to milk thistle or control. All participants received initial dosing of indinavir, and baseline indinavir levels were obtained (AUC(0-8)) (phase I). The active group were then given 450 mg milk-thistle extract capsules to be taken t.i.d. from day 2 to day 30. The control group received no plant extract. On day 29 and day 30, indinavir dosing and sampling was repeated in both groups as before (phase II). After a wash-out period of 7 days, indinavir dosing and sampling were repeated as before (phase III).

resultsAll participants completed the trial, but two were excluded from analysis due to protocol violation. There were no significant between-group differences. Active group mean AUC(0-8) indinavir decreased by 4.4% (90% CI, -27.5% to -26%, P=0.78) from phase I to phase II in the active group, and by 17.3% (90% CI, -37.3% to +9%, P=0.25) in phase III. Control group mean AUC(0-8) decreased by 21.5% (90% CI, -43% to +8%, P=0.2) from phase I to phase II and by 38.5% (90% CI, -55.3% to -15.3%, P=0.01) of baseline at phase III. To place our findings in context, milk thistle-indinavir trials were identified through systematic searches of the literature. A meta-analysis of three milk thistle-indinavir trials revealed a non-significant pooled mean difference of 1% in AUC(0-8) (95% CI, -53% to 55%, P=0.97).

conclusionsIndinavir levels were not reduced significantly in the presence of milk thistle.

Indexed as

Silybum marianumAdultArea Under CurveDrug InteractionsHalf-LifeHIV Protease InhibitorsHumansIndinavirMaleMeta-Analysis as TopicPlant PreparationsHIV Protease InhibitorsIndinavirPlant Preparations

Identifiers

PMID15666173
OpenAlexW2020245539

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.