Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15665247›Full record

ArticlePlant physiology2005

Beyond complementation. Map-based cloning in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Linda A Rymarquis, Jocelyn M Handley, Mabel Thomas, David B Stern

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant physiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cold Adaptation Mechanisms of a Snow AlgaFrontiers in microbiology · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The Chlamydomonas genome project: a decade on.Trends in plant science · 2014
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Linda A RymarquisBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.
Jocelyn M Handley
Mabel Thomas
David B Stern
Cornell University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydomonas reinhardtii is an excellent model system for plant biologists because of its ease of manipulation, facile genetics, and the ability to transform the nuclear, chloroplast, and mitochondrial genomes. Numerous forward genetics studies have been performed in Chlamydomonas, in many cases to elucidate the regulation of photosynthesis. One of the resultant challenges is moving from mutant phenotype to the gene mutation causing that phenotype. To date, complementation has been the primary method for gene cloning, but this is impractical in several situations, for example, when the complemented strain cannot be readily selected or in the case of recessive suppressors that restore photosynthesis. New tools, including a molecular map consisting of 506 markers and an 8X-draft nuclear genome sequence, are now available, making map-based cloning increasingly feasible. Here we discuss advances in map-based cloning developed using the strains mcd4 and mcd5, which carry recessive nuclear suppressors restoring photosynthesis to chloroplast mutants. Tools that have not been previously applied to Chlamydomonas, such as bulked segregant analysis and marker duplexing, are being implemented to increase the speed at which one can go from mutant phenotype to gene. In addition to assessing and applying current resources, we outline anticipated future developments in map-based cloning in the context of the newly extended Chlamydomonas genome initiative.

Indexed as

AnimalsChlamydomonas reinhardtiiChromosome MappingCloning, MolecularGenetic MarkersMutationGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID15665247
PMCPMC1065356
OpenAlexW2148764747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.