ArticleBiophysical journal2005
Paradoxical loss of excitation with high intensity pulses during electric field stimulation of single cardiac cells.
Article in Biophysical journal, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Electrical Stimulation for Low-Energy Termination of Cardiac Arrhythmias: a Review.Cardiovascular drugs and therapy · 2023Review
- Damage-free peripheral nerve stimulation by 12-ns pulsed electric field.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Optical imaging of voltage and calcium in cardiac cells & tissues.Circulation research · 2012Review
- Low energy defibrillation in human cardiac tissue: a simulation study.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Cardiac myocyte excitation by ultrashort high-field pulses.Biophysical journal · 2009Article
- Extracellular recordings of field potentials from single cardiomyocytes.Biophysical journal · 2006Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transmembrane potential responses of single cardiac cells stimulated at rest were studied with uniform rectangular field pulses having durations of 0.5-10 ms. Cells were enzymatically isolated from guinea pig ventricles, stained with voltage sensitive dye di-8-ANEPPS, and stimulated along their long axes. Fluorescence signals were recorded with spatial resolution of 17 microm for up to 11 sites along the cell. With 5 and 10 ms pulses, all cells (n = 10) fired an action potential over a broad range of field amplitudes (approximately 3-65 V/cm). With 0.5 and 1 ms pulses, all cells (n = 7) fired an action potential for field amplitudes ranging from the threshold value (approximately 4-8 V/cm) to 50-60 V/cm. However, when the field amplitude was further increased, five of seven cells failed to fire an action potential. We postulated that this paradoxical loss of excitation for higher amplitude field pulses is the result of nonuniform polarization of the cell membrane under conditions of electric field stimulation, and a counterbalancing interplay between sodium current and inwardly rectifying potassium current with increasing field strength. This hypothesis was verified using computer simulations of a field-stimulated guinea pig ventricular cell. In conclusion, we show that for stimulation with short-duration pulses, cells can be excited for fields ranging between a low amplitude excitation threshold and a high amplitude threshold above which the excitation is suppressed. These results can have implications for the mechanistic understanding of defibrillation outcome, especially in the setting of diseased myocardium.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.