ArticleHealth services research2005
Response rates and response bias for 50 surveys of pediatricians.
Article in Health services research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
158 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Increasing response rates from physicians in oncology research: a structured literature review and data from a recent physician survey.British journal of cancer · 2012Pooled it
- Testing the Impact of Mixed-Mode Designs (Mail and Web) and Multiple Contact Attempts within Mode (Mail or Web) on Clinician Survey Response.Health services research · 2018Trial
- Combining Internet-Based and Postal Survey Methods in a Survey among Gynecologists: Results of a Randomized Trial.Health services research · 2018Trial
- Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners' Responses to a Postal Versus Web-Based Survey: A Randomized Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Trial
- The effect of a monetary incentive for administrative assistants on the survey response rate: a randomized controlled trial.BMC medical research methodology · 2016Trial
- Allowing Physicians to Choose the Value of Compensation for Participation in a Web-Based Survey: Randomized Controlled Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2015Trial
- Does an offer for a free on-line continuing medical education (CME) activity increase physician survey response rate? A randomized trial.BMC research notes · 2012Trial
- A randomized trial of the impact of survey design characteristics on response rates among nursing home providers.Evaluation & the health professions · 2011Trial
- Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.Health services research · 2007Trial
- The elicitation of quality of life preferences for lung cancer treatment from the perspective of patients and treating physicians: results of two discrete choice experiments.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Determinants of Health Literacy-Tailored Communication Practices Adoption in French Community Pharmacies: A Theoretical Domains Framework Mixed-Methods Study.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Diagnosis, management, and prevention of bronchiolitis in primary care: a survey of Italian family paediatricians.Italian journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Medical provider perspectives on children with incarcerated parents: A mixed-methods study.Dialogues in health · 2025Article
- Clinical factors influencing retreatment with anti-PD-(L)1 therapies after treatment in early-stage cancers: a modified Delphi consensus study.Journal for immunotherapy of cancer · 2025Article
- Electronic Health Record Use Patterns Among Well-Being Survey Responders and Nonresponders: Longitudinal Observational Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Observational
- Invitation appeals and STEM academic scientists research participation: Findings from six survey experiments.PloS one · 2025Article
- Medical Professionalism and Its Association with Dropout Intention in Peruvian Medical Students during the COVID-19 Pandemic.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Characterizing participants who respond to text, email, phone calls, or postcards in a SARS-CoV-2 prevalence study.BMC public health · 2024Article
- Perceived Risk of Medical Cannabis and Prescribed Cannabinoids for Chronic Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Quebec Clinicians.Cannabis (Albuquerque, N.M.) · 2024Article
- Prioritization of clinical questions for the Australian Living Guideline for the Pharmacological Management of Inflammatory Arthritis.International journal of rheumatic diseases · 2023Article
98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
RESEARCH
objectiveTo track response rates across time for surveys of pediatricians, to explore whether response bias is present for these surveys, and to examine whether response bias increases with lower response rates. DATA SOURCE/STUDY
settingA total of 63,473 cases were gathered from 50 different surveys of pediatricians conducted by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) since 1994. Thirty-one surveys targeted active U.S. members of the AAP, six targeted pediatric residents, and the remaining 13 targeted AAP-member and nonmember pediatric subspecialists. Information for the full target samples, including nonrespondents, was collected using administrative databases of the AAP and the American Board of Pediatrics. STUDY
designTo assess bias for each survey, age, gender, location, and AAP membership type were compared for respondents and the full target sample. Correlational analyses were conducted to examine whether surveys with lower response rates had increasing levels of response bias. PRINCIPAL
findingsResponse rates to the 50 surveys examined declined significantly across survey years (1994-2002). Response rates ranged from 52 to 81 percent with an average of 68 percent. Comparisons between respondents and the full target samples showed the respondent group to be younger, to have more females, and to have less specialty-fellow members. Response bias was not apparent for pediatricians' geographical location. The average response bias, however, was fairly small for all factors: age (0.45 years younger), gender (1.4 percentage points more females), and membership type (1.1 percentage points fewer specialty-fellow members). Gender response bias was found to be inversely associated with survey response rates (r=-0.38). Even for the surveys with the lowest response rates, amount of response bias never exceeded 5 percentage points for gender, 3 years for age, or 3 percent for membership type.
conclusionsWhile response biases favoring women, young physicians, and nonspecialty-fellow members were found across the 52-81 percent response rates examined in this study, the amount of bias was minimal for these factors that could be tested. At least for surveys of pediatricians, more attention should be devoted by investigators to assessments of response bias rather than relying on response rates as a proxy of response bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.