Trial reportInternational urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction
Impact of duloxetine on quality of life for women with symptoms of urinary incontinence.
Trial report in International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Urinary incontinence and quality of life: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Aging clinical and experimental research · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Duloxetine.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2020Pooled it
- Adverse Events Associated with Nonsurgical Treatments for Urinary Incontinence in Women: a Systematic Review.Journal of general internal medicine · 2019Pooled it
- The role of duloxetine in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International urology and nephrology · 2013Pooled it
- Stress incontinence.BMJ clinical evidence · 2009Pooled it
- Evaluation and outcome measures in the treatment of female urinary stress incontinence: International Urogynecological Association (IUGA) guidelines for research and clinical practice.International urogynecology journal and pelvic floor dysfunction · 2008Guideline
- An evaluation of the cardiovascular safety profile of duloxetine: findings from 42 placebo-controlled studies.Drug safety · 2007Pooled it
- Serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRI) for stress urinary incontinence in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2005Pooled it
- The risk of bleeding with duloxetine treatment in patients who use nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs): analysis of placebo-controlled trials and post-marketing adverse event reports.Drug, healthcare and patient safety · 2013Article
- Profile of adverse events with duloxetine treatment: a pooled analysis of placebo-controlled studies.Drug safety · 2010Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of duloxetine in improving quality of life among women with stress and mixed urinary incontinence. The study included 451 women with self-reported stress incontinence episodes (>or=1/week) who were randomized to duloxetine (40 mg BID) or placebo in a double-blind, usual care design. Patients and physicians were allowed to titrate, augment, and/or discontinue treatment. Concomitant treatments were permitted. The primary outcome was the Incontinence Quality of Life Questionnaire (I-QOL) score, with assessments at 3, 6, and 9 months. Other measures included the Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) and adverse events. The adjusted mean change in I-QOL total score was greater in the duloxetine group than in the placebo group and at a level comparable to that found in previous clinical trials, but the difference between placebo and duloxetine was not statistically significant in the intent-to-treat, last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis. The difference approached statistical significance in favor of duloxetine at 3 months (p=0.07). PGI-I ratings did not demonstrate significant superiority for duloxetine in LOCF analysis; however, study completers taking duloxetine were significantly more likely to rate themselves as "better" (70.2%) than completers taking placebo (50.8%, p<0.05). Women utilized a variety of treatment methods including pelvic floor muscle training, estrogen, anticholinergic medication, weight reduction, and smoking cessation. In this study, while mean I-QOL change scores were numerically higher for the duloxetine group than mean change scores for the placebo group, this difference was not statistically significant. Among women who completed the study on study drug, a significantly greater proportion of duloxetine women versus placebo women rated their condition to be better.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15662490What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.