Trial reportRheumatology international2005
Comparison of cyclic and continuous calcitonin regimens in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis.
Trial report in Rheumatology international, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- [Austrian guidance for the pharmacological treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women--update 2009].Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift. Supplement · 2009Guideline
- Revisiting Intranasal Salmon Calcitonin: Historical Osteoporosis Evidence and a Potential Role in Acute Orthopaedic Pain Management.JBJS reviews · 2026Review
- Oral calcitonin.International journal of women's health · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We aimed to compare and evaluate the efficacies of a continuous regimen of intranasal salmon calcitonin (SCT) and two cyclic regimens (different cyclic regimens from previous studies) based on alternating 15 days or on 10 days consecutively per month for 1 year in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. We performed an open-label, prospective, randomized clinical trial. A total of 120 postmenopausal osteoporotic participants between 50 and 65 years old were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups. Patients in group 1 (n = 40) received continuously SCT nasal spray at a dose of 200 IU/day, plus continuously 500 mg/day elementary calcium and 0.25 microg/day 1-alpha hydroxyvitamin D3, for 1 year. Patients in group 2 (n = 40) received cyclically SCT nasal spray at a dose of 200 IU/day on alternating 15 days per month, plus continuously 500 mg/day elementary calcium and 0.25 microg/day 1-alpha hydroxyvitamin D3, for 1 year. Patients in group 3 (n = 40) received cyclically SCT nasal spray on 10 days consecutively per month (20 days/month rest), plus continuously 500 mg/day elementary calcium and 0.25 microg/day 1-alpha hydroxyvitamin D3, for 1 year. Data was evaluated by repeated analysis of variance (ANOVA). In addition, statistical differences between groups were assessed by the two-tailed Student's t test. After 1 year of the study, seven patients from group 1, eight patients from group 2 and five patients from group 3 withdrew from the study. No patient discontinued the study because of adverse drug effects. There was a statistically-significant improvement in pain intensity VAS scores at the end of the year to baseline scores in all three groups (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pain intensity VAS scores between groups at the end of the year (p > 0.05). Lumbar and femur neck BMD scores improved significantly at the end of treatment in all three groups (p < 0.05). There was no statistically-significant difference in BMD scores between groups at final (p > 0.05). Urinary DPD/Cre levels decreased significantly in all three groups by the end of the year (p < 0.05). There was no statistically-significant difference in urinary DPD/Cre final levels between groups (p > 0.05). According to the results of the present study, consecutive 10 days therapy with SCT, which is the first in the literature to our knowledge, is as effective as the other two regimens in the treatment of osteoporosis. Both cyclic regimens in our study (alternating 15 days and 10 consecutive days each month for 1 year) do appear to offer some advantages, especially economically and clinically, as compared to continuous treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15660234What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.