Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15656907›Full record

Trial reportBMC musculoskeletal disorders2005

Randomized clinical trial of surgery versus conservative therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome [ISRCTN84286481].

Brook I Martin, Linda M Levenson, William Hollingworth, Michel Kliot, Patrick J Heagerty, Judith A Turner, Jeffrey G Jarvik

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00032227 (Carpal Tunnel Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00032227 nacompletednot on this map

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnosis and Treatment Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of WashingtonRan2002 to 2008Enrolled116ConditionsCarpal Tunnel SyndromeArmsEarly Carpal Tunnel Release for Mild or Moderate CTS, MR Nerve Imaging for CTS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Surgical versus non-surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Brook I MartinDepartment of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine, Multidisciplinary Clinical Research Center, Box 359736, 325 Ninth Ave. Seattle, Washington 98104, USA. bim@u.washington.edu <bim@u.washington.edu>
Linda M Levenson
William Hollingworth
Michel Kliot
Patrick J Heagerty
Judith A Turner
Jeffrey G Jarvik
University of Washington · USHarborview Medical Center · US

Funding

Pilot--Synthesis of CT and MR images of cervical spineP60AR048093 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DEYO, RICHARD A · 2002 to 2006
$5.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR048093NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR48093
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConservative treatment remains the standard of care for treating mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome despite a small number of well-controlled studies and limited objective evidence to support current treatment options. There is an increasing interest in the usefulness of wrist magnetic resonance imaging could play in predicting who will benefit for various treatments. METHOD AND

designTwo hundred patients with mild to moderate symptoms will be recruited over 3 1/2 years from neurological surgery, primary care, electrodiagnostic clinics. We will exclude patients with clinical or electrodiagnostic evidence of denervation or thenar muscle atrophy. We will randomly assign patients to either a well-defined conservative care protocol or surgery. The conservative care treatment will include visits with a hand therapist, exercises, a self-care booklet, work modification/ activity restriction, B6 therapy, ultrasound and possible steroid injections. The surgical care would be left up to the surgeon (endoscopic vs. open) with usual and customary follow-up. All patients will receive a wrist MRI at baseline. Patients will be contacted at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after randomization to complete the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Assessment Questionnaire (CTSAQ). In addition, we will compare disability (activity and work days lost) and general well being as measured by the SF-36 version II. We will control for demographics and use psychological measures (SCL-90 somatization and depression scales) as well as EDS and MRI predictors of outcomes. DISCUSSION: We have designed a randomized controlled trial which will assess the effectiveness of surgery for patients with mild to moderate carpal tunnel syndrome. An important secondary goal is to study the ability of MRI to predict patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingNeurosurgical ProceduresCarpal Tunnel SyndromeHumansMedian NervePrognosis

Identifiers

PMID15656907
PMCPMC546190
OpenAlexW2124459408

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.