ReviewDer Internist2005
[Pathogenesis of the ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma: implications for future therapies?].
Review in Der Internist, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Pancreatic carcinoma].Der Internist · 2008Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite the advances in the knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis, pancreatic cancer remains a devastating disease with an 5-year survival rate below 5%. Current therapeutic approaches are not successful in respect to overall survival. There is a need to transfer the knowledge of basic science to new therapeutic strategies. This review describes the disturbed cell cycle control, anti-apoptotic mechanisms, the process of invasion and metastasis and angioneogenesis of pancreatic cancer cells. This knowledge will allow the development of novel therapeutic strategies for the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15655682What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.