Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15655505›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of pharmacology2005

Vascular effects of ovariectomy and chronic oestrogen treatment in rats: controversy or experimental protocol diversity?

Thierry Chataigneau, Valérie B Schini-Kerth

Open access · bronzeAbstract readCommentReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of pharmacology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thierry ChataigneauPharmacologie et Physico-Chimie des Interactions Cellulaires et Moléculaires, UMR CNRS 7034, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université Louis Pasteur de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France.
Valérie B Schini-Kerth
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several clinical studies have indicated that oestrogens have protective properties on the cardiovascular system. Although the beneficial effect has been attributable, at least in part, to their ability to stimulate the endothelial formation of nitric oxide (NO) and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor (EDHF), the underlying mechanism still remains unclear. In a study from this issue of British Journal of Pharmacology, Nawate et al. have examined the effects of rat ovariectomy and chronic treatment with 17beta-oestradiol on the endothelial function as assessed ex vivo. The data indicate that acetylcholine-induced endothelium-dependent relaxations of the isolated mesenteric artery are affected by neither ovariectomy nor chronic hormonal treatment. Despite the maintained endothelium-dependent relaxation, the contribution of the two major endothelial factors NO and EDHF was changed. Indeed, ovariectomy increased the NO-mediated component of the relaxation, most likely as a consequence of the downregulation of the physiological allosteric inhibitor of endothelial NO synthase, caveolin-1. In addition, ovariectomy decreased the EDHF-mediated component of the relaxation and membrane hyperpolarization of the smooth muscle cells, an effect which might be explained by a concomitant decrease of the expression of the gap junction connexin-40 and connexin-43. Furthermore, chronic administration of 17beta-estradiol to ovariectomized rats normalized all these effects. This study provides further experimental evidence indicating that the hormonal status plays a determinant role in the control of the endothelial formation of both NO and EDHF.

Indexed as

OvariectomyAnimalsEndothelium, VascularEstrogensHumansResearch DesignEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID15655505
PMCPMC1576004
OpenAlexW1986493646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.