ReviewAnnals of family medicine2004
Future of research in family medicine: where to from here?
Review in Annals of family medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Family medicine research: seizing the moment to advance the field.BMC health services research · 2024Review
- Defining dimensions of research readiness: a conceptual model for primary care research networks.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- Residency research requirements and the CanMEDS-FM scholar role: perspectives of residents and recent graduates.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012Article
- Family medicine research capacity building: five-weekend programs in Ontario.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2010Article
- The case of 'protective fever and chest signs': towards a better understanding of general practice databases.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2007Article
- Overcoming obstacles to implementing a primary care research framework.Osteopathic medicine and primary care · 2007Article
- Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity.Annals of family medicine · 2004Article
- Journal of Family and Community Medicine: A scientometric analysis 1994-2020.Journal of family & community medicineReview
- Longitudinal research and data collection in primary care.Annals of family medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Desired research outcomes in family medicine vary according to the developmental stage of the discipline and the context of practice. Several milestones in the evolution of family practice research worldwide have been achieved. Now family medicine researchers face the challenge of discovering how evidence-based primary health care can be delivered in a sustainable way to individuals within communities. To advance family medicine research, we must ensure that trainees have a positive research attitude, develop academic clinician-researchers, lobby for primary care research funding, support practitioners who wish to do research in their own practices, sustain practice-based research networks, and study important questions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.