ArticleAnnals of family medicine2004
Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
57 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultivating a Culture of Research in Saudi Board Family Medicine Program.Family medicine · 2026Article
- Advocacy and policy leadership training for primary care: a global environmental scan of competency frameworks, interventions, and strategic priorities.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- The sustainability of practice-based research networks across the globe - insights from a worldwide qualitative study.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Family medicine research: seizing the moment to advance the field.BMC health services research · 2024Review
- Evolution of public funding since primary care research was considered as a priority research domain in france.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Key informants perspectives on creating a high impact research department in family and community medicine: a qualitative project.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Features and development trends of primary care research conducted by practice-based research networks from 1991 to 2023: a scoping review protocol.Systematic reviews · 2023Article
- Improving the Reporting of Primary Care Research: Consensus Reporting Items for Studies in Primary Care-the CRISP Statement.Annals of family medicine · 2023Article
- Attitudes of primary healthcare chief physicians towards research in Finland - a national study.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2023Article
- Article
- The EGPRN Research Strategy for general practice in Europe.The European journal of general practice · 2022Review
- Article
- Establishing family physician research networks in South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2020Article
- Fostering global primary care research: a capacity-building approach.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Practical mixed methods strategies used to integrate qualitative and quantitative methods in community-based primary health care research.Family practice · 2019Review
- Integrated people-centred primary health care in Greece: unravelling Ariadne's thread.Primary health care research & development · 2019Article
- Proliferation of the WReN spider, an instrument to measure health professionals' experience of research: a bibliographic study.BMC medical education · 2019Article
- The publication rate of oral presentations presented in national congresses of Turkish Society of Cardiovascular Surgery.Turk gogus kalp damar cerrahisi dergisi · 2019Article
- Why and how to use mixed methods in primary health care research.Family practice · 2019Article
- Strategies to improve research capacity across European general practice: The views of members of EGPRN and Wonca Europe.The European journal of general practice · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An invitational conference led by the World Organization of Family Doctors (Wonca) involving selected delegates from 34 countries was held in Kingston, Ontario, Canada, March 8 to 12, 2003. The conference theme was "Improving Health Globally: The Necessity of Family Medicine Research." Guiding conference discussions was the value that to improve health care worldwide, strong, evidence-based primary care is indispensable. Eight papers reviewed before the meeting formed the basic material from which the conference developed 9 recommendations. Wonca, as an international body of family medicine, was regarded as particularly suited to pursue these conference recommendations: 1. Research achievements in family medicine should be displayed to policy makers, health (insurance) authorities, and academic leaders in a systematic way. 2. In all countries, sentinel practice systems should be developed to provide surveillance reports on illness and diseases that have the greatest impact on the population's health and wellness in the community. 3. A clearinghouse should be organized to provide a central repository of knowledge about family medicine research expertise, training, and mentoring.4. National research institutes and university departments of family medicine with a research mission should be developed. 5. Practice-based research networks should be developed around the world.6. Family medicine research journals, conferences, and Web sites should be strengthened to disseminate research findings internationally, and their use coordinated. Improved representation of family medicine research journals in databases, such as Index Medicus, should be pursued.7. Funding of international collaborative research in family medicine should be facilitated.8. International ethical guidelines, with an international ethical review process, should be developed in particular for participatory (action) research, where researchers work in partnership with communities. 9. When implementing these recommendations, the specific needs and implications for developing countries should be addressed.The Wonca executive committee has reviewed these recommendations and the supporting rationale for each. They plan to follow the recommendations, but to do so will require the support and cooperation of many individuals, organizations, and national governments around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.