ArticleAnnals of family medicine2004
Changing research culture.
Article in Annals of family medicine, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cultivating a Culture of Research in Saudi Board Family Medicine Program.Family medicine · 2026Article
- National culture as a correlate of research impact and productivity.F1000Research · 2019Article
- Patient and professional attitudes towards research in general practice: the RepR qualitative study.BMC family practice · 2014Article
- International collaboration in primary care: a win-win situation.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2012Article
- Residency research requirements and the CanMEDS-FM scholar role: perspectives of residents and recent graduates.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2012Article
- The profile of general practitioners (GPs) who publish in selected family practice journals.BMC research notes · 2011Article
- Developing a teaching research culture for general practice registrars in Australia: a literature review.Asia Pacific family medicine · 2009Article
- Bursaries, writing grants and fellowships: a strategy to develop research capacity in primary health care.BMC family practice · 2007Article
- Improving health care globally: a critical review of the necessity of family medicine research and recommendations to build research capacity.Annals of family medicine · 2004Article
- The role of the champion in primary care change efforts: from the State Networks of Colorado Ambulatory Practices and Partners (SNOCAP).Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine : JABFMArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although there is general agreement that family medicine has a lot to offer to the health care system, the academic dimension is still not widely understood. There are two main reasons why family medicine needs to develop its scientific potential: to address the true nature of the discipline, and to help in its recognition. The academic establishment benefits from academic family medicine by gaining new questions that are necessary to be answered and by gaining new research approaches.Many problems are encountered when introducing family medicine into the academic arena. Two main strategies for developing family medicine research can be identified. The first is to adapt to the existing structure of the academic world by claiming equal rights with the developed disciplines, collaborating with other university departments in their research projects, publishing articles in established journals, and participating in established faculty development programs. The other, more demanding, strategy is to introduce changes to the academic arena by developing specific research questions, by collaborating on research within family medicine, and by developing family medicine's own success criteria for academic excellence. The two approaches are not mutually exclusive. The World Organization of Family Doctors plays an important role in supporting both approaches through its international affiliations and contacts with policy makers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.