SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2005
Interventions used to improve control of blood pressure in patients with hypertension.
Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 19 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Implementation of a Pharmacy-Intervention to Establish and if Necessary Improve Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy. A Cluster Randomized Trial.
A Randomised Controlled Trial to Improve Hypertension Outcomes Using Wireless Home Blood Pressure Monitoring With Automatic Outcome-based Feedback and Financial Incentives
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-monitoring of blood pressure in hypertension: A systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.PLoS medicine · 2017Pooled it
- Doctors record higher blood pressures than nurses: systematic review and meta-analysis.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2014Pooled it
- Nurse led interventions to improve control of blood pressure in people with hypertension: systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ (Clinical research ed.) · 2010Pooled it
- Cardiovascular health disparities: a systematic review of health care interventions.Medical care research and review : MCRR · 2007Pooled it
- Daily self-monitoring of blood pressure decreases systolic and diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive participants.Heart and vessels · 2022Trial
- Individual patient data meta-analysis of self-monitoring of blood pressure (BP-SMART): a protocol.BMJ open · 2015Trial
- Racial differences in two self-management hypertension interventions.The American journal of medicine · 2011Trial
- Protocol for a randomised controlled trial of telemonitoring and self-management in the control of hypertension: telemonitoring and self-management in hypertension. [ISRCTN17585681].BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2009Trial
- CRISTOPH - a cluster-randomised intervention study to optimise the treatment of patients with hypertension in General Practice.BMC family practice · 2008Trial
- Wireless Home Blood Pressure Monitoring System With Automatic Outcome-Based Feedback and Financial Incentives to Improve Blood Pressure in People With Hypertension: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2021Article
- BRInging the Diabetes prevention program to GEriatric populations (BRIDGE): a feasibility study.Pilot and feasibility studies · 2019Article
- Psychobehavioral Profiles to Assist Tailoring of Interventions for Patients With Hypertension: Latent Profile Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Prevalence of blood pressure self-monitoring, medication adherence, self-efficacy, stage of change, and blood pressure control among municipal workers with hypertension.Workplace health & safety · 2012Article
- Pay for performance: is it the best way to improve control of hypertension?Current hypertension reports · 2007Review
- Meta-analysis does not allow appraisal of complex interventions in diabetes and hypertension self-management: a methodological review.Diabetologia · 2007Review
- 'Under pressure': How Ghanaian, African-Surinamese and Dutch patients explain hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2006Article
- Rational Prescribing in Primary care (RaPP): process evaluation of an intervention to improve prescribing of antihypertensive and cholesterol-lowering drugs.Implementation science : IS · 2006Article
- Overcoming clinical inertia in the management of hypertension.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2006Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Updated by
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIt is well recognized that patients with high blood pressure (hypertension) in the community frequently fail to meet treatment goals- a condition labeled as "uncontrolled" hypertension. The optimal way in which to organize and deliver care to patients who have hypertension so that they reach treatment goals has not been clearly identified.
objectivesTo determine the effectiveness of interventions to improve control of blood pressure in patients with elevated blood pressure. To evaluate the ability of reminders to improve the follow-up of patients with elevated blood pressure. SEARCH STRATEGY: All-language search of all articles (any year) in the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CCTR), Medline and Embase from June 2000. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with hypertension that evaluated the following interventions: (1) self-monitoring (2) educational interventions directed to the patient (3) educational interventions directed to the health professional (4) health professional (nurse or pharmacist) led care (5) organisational interventions that aimed to improve the delivery of care (6) appointment reminder systems. OUTCOMES ASSESSED WERE: (1) mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure (2) control of blood pressure (3) proportion of patients followed up at clinic. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors extracted data independently and in duplicate and assessed each study according to the criteria outlined by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook. MAIN
results59 RCTs met our inclusion criteria. The methodological quality of included studies was variable. An organized system of regular review linked to vigorous antihypertensive drug therapy was shown to reduce blood pressure (weighted mean difference -8.2/-4.2 mmHg, -11.7/-6.5 mmHg, -10.6/-7.6 mmHg for 3 strata of entry blood pressure) and all-cause mortality at five years follow-up (6.38% versus 7.78%, difference 1.4%) in a single large RCT- the Hypertension Detection and Follow-Up study. Other interventions had variable effects. Self-monitoring was associated with moderate net reduction in diastolic blood pressure (weighted mean difference (WMD): -2.03 mmHg, 95%CI: -2.69 to -1.38 mmHg, respectively. Appointment reminders increased the proportion of individuals who attended for follow-up. RCTs of educational interventions directed at patients or health professionals were heterogeneous but appeared unlikely to be associated with large net reductions in blood pressure by themselves. Health professional (nurse or pharmacist) led care may be a promising way of delivering care, with the majority of RCTs being associated with improved blood pressure control, but requires further evaluation. AUTHORS'
conclusionsFamily practices and community-based clinics need to have an organized system of regular follow-up and review of their hypertensive patients. Antihypertensive drug therapy should be implemented by means of a systematic stepped care approach when patients do not reach target blood pressure levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.