ArticleJournal of neurology2005
Secondary prevention after ischemic stroke. Evolution over time in practice.
Article in Journal of neurology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood pressure after follow-up in a stroke prevention clinic.Brain and behavior · 2020Trial
- Time trends in statin use and incidence of recurrent cardiovascular events in secondary prevention between 1999 and 2013: a registry-based study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2018Article
- Changes in pre-hospital management of vascular risk factors among patients admitted due to recurrent stroke in Poland from 1995 to 2013.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2016Article
- Risk awareness in secondary stroke prevention: a review of the literature.JRSM cardiovascular disease · 2014Article
- Knowledge of stroke risk factors among primary care patients with previous stroke or TIA: a questionnaire study.BMC family practice · 2010Article
- Intra-cerebral haemorrhages: are there any differences in baseline characteristics and intra-hospital mortality between hospitaland population-based registries?Journal of neurology · 2009Article
- Risk awareness and knowledge of patients with stroke: results of a questionnaire survey 3 months after stroke.Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry · 2006Article
- Awareness, treatment, and control of vascular risk factors among stroke survivors.Journal of stroke and cerebrovascular diseases : the official journal of National Stroke AssociationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAn optimal management of vascular risk factors, associated with antithrombotic drugs and carotid surgery when appropriate, reduces the risk of a new vascular event after stroke. Although secondary prevention is not optimal in many patients in practice, the question of whether there is an improvement over time remains unanswered. The aim of our study was to test the hypothesis that secondary prevention measures after cerebral ischemia improve over time.
methodWe included 123 consecutive patients in 1994, and 125 consecutive patients in 2002, who were admitted to a neurological department for any reason and had had an episode of cerebral ischemia less than 6 years earlier. We compared the groups for the management of arterial hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, diabetes mellitus and smoking. We recorded the values of blood pressure, biological parameters, and presence of antithrombotic therapy, lipid-lowering and anti-hypertensive drugs. Whether patients were properly treated or not, was determined by a comparison between their current treatment and guidelines available when recruited.
resultsPrevention was not optimal in 96 of 123 (78%) patients in 1994, and in 77 of 125 (62 %) in 2002. Vascular risk factors were better identified and managed in 2002 than in 1994, especially for hypercholesterolemia. Antithrombotic therapies, statins and antihypertensive drugs, except calcium channel blockers, were more often used in 2002. The proportion of patients in whom arterial hypertension and hypercholesterolemia were identified was higher in 2002, but the proportion of patients identified as diabetics remained stable. However, the proportion of patients with blood pressure >140/90 mmHg, glycemia >or = 126 mg/dl, total cholesterol level > or = 240 mg/dl, or being current smokers, were significantly lower in 2002 than in 1994.
conclusionAlthough most of patients with previous cerebral ischemia did not receive an optimal management of their risk factors in 2002, there was an improvement over an 8-year period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.