Trial reportJournal of neurology2005
Comparative tolerance of IFN beta-1a regimens in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. The EVIDENCE study.
Trial report in Journal of neurology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Natalizumab and Tyruko (natalizumab biosimilar) for treating highly active relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis after at least one disease-modifying therapy: a systematic review and economic model.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026Pooled it
- Induced Stem Cells as a Novel Multiple Sclerosis Therapy.Current stem cell research & therapy · 2016Review
- Improving compliance with interferon-beta therapy in patients with multiple sclerosis.CNS drugs · 2009Article
- Assessing cost-effectiveness in the management of multiple sclerosis.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2009Article
- Treating relapsing multiple sclerosis with subcutaneous versus intramuscular interferon-beta-1a: modelling the clinical and economic implications.PharmacoEconomics · 2009Article
- Multiple sclerosis therapy: an update on recently finished trials.Journal of neurology · 2007Review
- Review
- Importance of benefit-to-risk assessment for disease-modifying drugs used to treat MS.Journal of neurology · 2004Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The EVIDENCE study was a direct comparative study of two dose regimens of interferon (IFN) beta-1a used in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS): 30 mcg intramuscularly once weekly (qw; n=338) and 44 mcg subcutaneously three times weekly (tiw; n=339). The study continued for an average of 64 weeks. The safety population consisted of all patients receiving at least one dose of study drug. Clinical assessments occurred every 4 weeks for 24 weeks and then every 12 weeks. Blood tests for safety were taken at baseline and at weeks 4 and 12, and every 12 weeks thereafter. Overall adverse events were more common with the 44 mcg tiw regimen (p=0.007), and were due predominantly to differences in injection-site reactions. The majority of adverse events were rated mild by investigators. Hepatic and haematological adverse events and asymptomatic laboratory abnormalities were more common with 44 mcg tiw (p<0.001),with no difference seen for severe events. Flu-like symptoms were more common with 30 mcg qw (p=0.031), were more severe and persisted for longer. Serious adverse events were comparable for both groups, as were drug discontinuations. In conclusion, although adverse events were more common with high-dose, high-frequency IFN therapy, differences were primarily for mild events and did not affect treatment adherence. Based on superior clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes over an average of 64 weeks, coupled with modest safety differences, the risk-benefit ratio for IFN therapy in RRMS favours the 44 mcg tiw regimen over this period of time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.