Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15650890›Full record

Trial reportKnee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA2005

Midvastus approach in total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, double-blinded study on early rehabilitation.

Holger Bäthis, Lars Perlick, Christian Blum, Christian Lüring, Carsten Perlick, Joachim Grifka

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Comparison of the minimally invasive and standard medial parapatellar approaches for primary total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2012
    Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Better quadriceps recovery after minimally invasive total knee arthroplasty.Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2014
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Current perspectives in stem cell research for knee cartilage repair.Stem cells and cloning : advances and applications · 2014
    Review
  14. Anterior knee pain after total knee arthroplasty: does it correlate with patellar blood flow?Knee surgery, sports traumatology, arthroscopy : official journal of the ESSKA · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. [The mini-midvastus approach for total knee arthroplasty].Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2009
    Article
  17. The mini-incision mid-vastus approach for total knee arthroplasty.Operative Orthopadie und Traumatologie · 2008
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Holger BäthisDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Regensburg, Germany. holger.baethis@klinik.uni-regensburg.de
Lars Perlick
Christian Blum
Christian Lüring
Carsten Perlick
Joachim Grifka

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The medial parapatellar approach has become the standard technique in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, recent studies have reported superior results regarding functional recovery when using the midvastus approach. It was the aim of this study to evaluate the early functional outcome of both surgical techniques. In a prospective, double-blinded, randomized study, 50 patients for TKA were consecutively operated on either by the medial parapatellar or the midvastus approach. Exclusion criteria were defined as previous open knee surgery and leg deformity of more than 10 degrees varus or valgus. TKA was performed in all patients by one surgeon using the same type of implants in both groups. Pain scores (VAS) were documented and follow-up data including quadriceps strength and proprioception were obtained 3 weeks and 6 weeks postoperatively. Both groups were comparable in preoperative demographic data. Postoperatively, patients in the midvastus group demonstrated significantly lower pain in rest (VAS: mean 2.25 vs. 3.03) and under movement (VAS: mean 2.92 vs. 3.13). Further, they showed superior isometric quadriceps strength at 3 weeks (41.4 vs. 27.6 Nm) and 6 weeks (47.6 vs. 35.5 Nm). Moreover, this group showed a superior postoperative proprioception, while the range of motion was similar in both groups. The midvastus approach offers advantages over the standard parapatellar arthrotomy, in the early rehabilitation period. No adverse effects were observed associated with this approach. Therefore, the midvastus approach should be considered as a valuable alternative in TKA.

Indexed as

AgedArthroplasty, Replacement, KneeDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansKnee ProsthesisMiddle AgedPain MeasurementPatellaPostoperative PainProprioceptionRange of Motion, ArticularTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.