Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15642162›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2005

Membrane estrogen receptor-alpha levels predict estrogen-induced ERK1/2 activation in MCF-7 cells.

Dragoslava Zivadinovic, Cheryl S Watson

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 104 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Endothelial estrogen receptor isoforms and cardiovascular disease.Molecular and cellular endocrinology · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Dragoslava ZivadinovicDepartment of Human Biological Chemistry and Genetics, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, USA. ddzivadi@utmb.edu
Cheryl S Watson
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWe examined the participation of a membrane form of estrogen receptor (mER)-alpha in the activation of mitogen-activated protein kinases (extracellular signal-regulated kinase [ERK]1 and ERK2) related to cell growth responses in MCF-7 cells.

methodsWe immunopanned and subsequently separated MCF-7 cells (using fluorescence-activated cell sorting) into mER-alpha-enriched (mERhigh) and mER-alpha-depleted (mERlow) populations. We then measured the expression levels of mER-alpha on the surface of these separated cell populations by immunocytochemical analysis and by a quantitative 96-well plate immunoassay that distinguished between mER-alpha and intracellular ER-alpha. Western analysis was used to determine colocalized estrogen receptor (ER)-alpha and caveolins in membrane subfractions. The levels of activated ERK1 and ERK2 were determined using a fixed cell-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay developed in our laboratory.

resultsImmunocytochemical studies revealed punctate ER-alpha antibody staining of the surface of nonpermeabilized mERhigh cells, whereas the majority of mERlow cells exhibited little or no staining. Western analysis demonstrated that mERhigh cells expressed caveolin-1 and caveolin-2, and that ER-alpha was contained in the same gradient-separated membrane fractions. The quantitative immunoassay for ER-alpha detected a significant difference in mER-alpha levels between mERhigh and mERlow cells when cells were grown at a sufficiently low cell density, but equivalent levels of total ER-alpha (membrane plus intracellular receptors). These two separated cell subpopulations also exhibited different kinetics of ERK1/2 activation with 1 pmol/l 17beta-estradiol (E2), as well as different patterns of E2 dose-dependent responsiveness. The maximal kinase activation was achieved after 10 min versus 6 min in mERhigh versus mERlow cells, respectively. After a decline in the level of phosphorylated ERKs, a reactivation was seen at 60 min in mERhigh cells but not in mERlow cells. Both 1A and 2B protein phosphatases participated in dephosphorylation of ERKs, as demonstrated by efficient reversal of ERK1/2 inactivation with okadaic acid and cyclosporin A.

conclusionOur results suggest that the levels of mER-alpha play a role in the temporal coordination of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation events for the ERKs in breast cancer cells, and that these signaling differences can be correlated to previously demonstrated differences in E2-induced cell proliferation outcomes in these cell types.

Indexed as

Blotting, WesternBreast NeoplasmsCell MembraneCell ProliferationEnzyme ActivationEnzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansImmunohistochemistryMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3PhosphorylationTumor Cells, CulturedEstradiolEstrogen Receptor alphaMitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 1Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase 3

Identifiers

PMID15642162
PMCPMC1064105
OpenAlexW2150699733

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.