ArticleGenome biology2005
Microarray-based resequencing of multiple Bacillus anthracis isolates.
Article in Genome biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
35 citing papers in PubMed.
- A classification framework forEvolutionary applications · 2020Article
- Article
- Development of a physical model-based algorithm for the detection of single-nucleotide substitutions by using tiling microarrays.PloS one · 2013Article
- Excess variants in AFF2 detected by massively parallel sequencing of males with autism spectrum disorder.Human molecular genetics · 2012Article
- Identification of rare X-linked neuroligin variants by massively parallel sequencing in males with autism spectrum disorder.Molecular autism · 2012Article
- Genomic characterization of the Bacillus cereus sensu lato species: backdrop to the evolution of Bacillus anthracis.Genome research · 2012Article
- Pneumococcal genome sequencing tracks a vaccine escape variant formed through a multi-fragment recombination event.Nature genetics · 2012Article
- Recombination and population structure in Salmonella enterica.PLoS genetics · 2011Article
- Genetic variation and linkage disequilibrium in Bacillus anthracis.Scientific reports · 2011Article
- Evaluation of second-generation sequencing of 19 dilated cardiomyopathy genes for clinical applications.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2010Article
- A novel custom resequencing array for dilated cardiomyopathy.Genetics in medicine : official journal of the American College of Medical Genetics · 2010Article
- Article
- Genomic characterization of the Yersinia genus.Genome biology · 2010Article
- Applications of microarrays in pathogen detection and biodefence.Trends in biotechnology · 2009Review
- Article
- Comparative genomics-based investigation of resequencing targets in Vibrio fischeri: focus on point miscalls and artefactual expansions.BMC genomics · 2008Article
- Applying rapid genome sequencing technologies to characterize pathogen genomes.Analytical chemistry · 2008Article
- Massively parallel pathogen identification using high-density microarrays.Microbial biotechnology · 2008Article
- Article
- In silico comparison of bacterial strains using mutual information.Journal of biosciences · 2007Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We used custom-designed resequencing arrays to generate 3.1 Mb of genomic sequence from a panel of 56 Bacillus anthracis strains. Sequence quality was shown to be very high by replication (discrepancy rate of 7.4 x 10(-7)) and by comparison to independently generated shotgun sequence (discrepancy rate < 2.5 x 10(-6)). Population genomics studies of microbial pathogens using rapid resequencing technologies such as resequencing arrays are critical for recognizing newly emerging or genetically engineered strains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.