Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15640842›Full record

ReviewOncogene2005

Polo-like kinases and oncogenesis.

Frank Eckerdt, Juping Yuan, Klaus Strebhardt

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 186 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
186citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

186 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 369 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. High-throughput virtual screening, identification andJournal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

126 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Frank EckerdtDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical School, JW Goethe-University, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, Frankfurt D-60590, Germany. frank.eckerdt@uchsc.edu
Juping Yuan
Klaus Strebhardt
Goethe University Frankfurt · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Polo-like kinases (Plks) play pivotal roles in the regulation of cell cycle progression. Plk1, the best characterized family member among mammalian Plks, strongly promotes the progression of cells through mitosis. Furthermore, Plk1 is found to be overexpressed in a variety of human tumors and its expression correlates with cellular proliferation and prognosis of tumor patients. Although all Plks share two conserved elements, the N-terminal Ser/Thr kinase domain and a highly homologues C-terminal region termed the polo-box motif, their functions diverge considerably. While Plk1 is inhibited by different checkpoint pathways, Plk2 and Plk3 are activated by the spindle checkpoint or the DNA damage checkpoint. Thus, Plk2 and Plk3 seem to inhibit oncogenic transformation. Deregulation of Plk1 activity contributes to genetic instability, which in turn leads to oncogenic transformation. In contrast, Plk2 and Plk3 are involved in checkpoint-mediated cell cycle arrest to ensure genetic stability, thereby inhibiting the accumulation of genetic defects. In this review, we shall discuss the roles of Plks in oncogenesis and Plk1 as a target for therapeutic intervention against cancer.

Indexed as

AnimalsG2 PhaseGenes, Tumor SuppressorHumansMitosisNeoplasmsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine Kinases

Identifiers

PMID15640842
OpenAlexW2076183717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.