Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15640837›Full record

ReviewOncogene2005

Yeast polo-like kinases: functionally conserved multitask mitotic regulators.

Kyung S Lee, Jung-Eun Park, Satoshi Asano, Chong J Park

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Oncogene, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Moonlighting at the Poles: Non-Canonical Functions of Centrosomes.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2022
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Heliyon · 2019
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Dbf4: the whole is greater than the sum of its parts.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2013
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kyung S LeeLaboratory of Metabolism, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 9000 Rockville Pike, Bldg 37, Rm 3118, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA. kyunglee@mail.nih.gov
Jung-Eun Park
Satoshi Asano
Chong J Park
National Cancer Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The polo-like kinases (Plks) are a conserved subfamily of Ser/Thr protein kinases that play pivotal roles in regulating various cellular and biochemical events at multiple stages of M phase. Genetic and biochemical data revealed that both the budding yeast and the fission yeast polo kinase homologs (Cdc5 and Plo1, respectively) bear remarkable functional similarities with those in metazoan organisms, suggesting that the role of Plks is largely conserved throughout evolution. Thus, studies on Plks in genetically amenable lower eucaryotic organisms may yield valuable insights into the function of Plks in higher eucaryotic organisms. In this review, common properties and distinct functions of Cdc5 and Plo1 will be discussed and compared to properties and functions of Plks in higher eucaryotic organisms.

Indexed as

Cell Cycle ProteinsCytokinesisMitosisPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProtein Structure, TertiaryProto-Oncogene ProteinsYeastsCell Cycle ProteinsPolo-Like Kinase 1Protein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene Proteins

Identifiers

PMID15640837
OpenAlexW2081237677

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.