Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15640358›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2005

Distinct DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses drive the loss of oocytes in recombination-defective mouse mutants.

Monica Di Giacomo, Marco Barchi, Frédéric Baudat, Winfried Edelmann, Scott Keeney, Maria Jasin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 143 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
143citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

143 citing papers in PubMed, 244 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Meiotic Recombination in Teleosts.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. BRCA1 safeguards genome integrity by activating chromosome asynapsis checkpoint to eliminate recombination-defective oocytes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article

83 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Monica Di GiacomoMolecular Biology Program, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Graduate School of Medical Sciences of Cornell University, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY 10021, USA.
Marco Barchi
Frédéric Baudat
Winfried Edelmann
Scott Keeney
Maria Jasin
Cornell University · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USAlbert Einstein College of Medicine · US

Funding

Role of Spo11 and recombination in mouse meiosisR01HD040916 · NICHD · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI JASIN, MARIA · 2001 to 2011
$5.4M
NICHD NIH HHS HD40916NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD040916
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defects in meiotic recombination in many organisms result in arrest because of activation of a meiotic checkpoint(s). The proximal defect that triggers this checkpoint in mammalian germ cells is not understood, but it has been suggested to involve either the presence of DNA damage in the form of unrepaired recombination intermediates or defects in homologous chromosome pairing and synapsis independent of DNA damage per se. To distinguish between these possibilities in the female germ line, we compared mouse oocyte development in a mutant that fails to form the double-strand breaks (DSBs) that initiate meiotic recombination (Spo11-/-) to mutants with defects in processing DSBs when they are formed (Dmc1-/- and Msh5-/-), and we examined the epistasis relationships between these mutations. Absence of DSB formation caused a partial defect in follicle formation, whereas defects in DSB repair caused earlier and more severe meiotic arrest, which could be suppressed by eliminating DSB formation. Therefore, our analysis reveals that there are both DNA-damage-dependent and -independent responses to recombination errors in mammalian oocytes. By using these findings as a paradigm, we also examined oocyte loss in mutants lacking the DNA-damage checkpoint kinase ATM. The absence of ATM caused defects in folliculogenesis that were similar to those in Dmc1 mutants and that could be suppressed by Spo11 mutation, implying that oocyte death in Atm-deficient animals is a response to defective DSB repair.

Indexed as

OocytesRecombination, GeneticAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA DamageEndodeoxyribonucleasesEpistasis, GeneticEsterasesFemaleMeiosisMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11MiceMice, KnockoutNuclear ProteinsOvarian FollicleCell Cycle ProteinsDmc1 protein, mouseDNA-Binding ProteinsEndodeoxyribonucleasesEsterasesMeiotic Recombination Protein SPO11Msh5 protein, mouseNuclear ProteinsPhosphate-Binding ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID15640358
PMCPMC545532
OpenAlexW2059204632

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.