Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15639777›Full record

ReviewNeurotoxicity research2004

Gene-environment interplay in neurogenesis and neurodegeneration.

Tomás Palomo, Trevor Archer, Richard J Beninger, Richard M Kostrzewa

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Neurotoxicity research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tomás PalomoServicio Psiquiátrico, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Avda. de Córdoba s/n, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Trevor Archer
Richard J Beninger
Richard M Kostrzewa

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Factors associated with predisposition and vulnerability to neurodegenerative disorders may be described usefully within the context of gene-environment interplay. There are many identified genetic determinants for so-called genetic disorders, and it is possible to duplicate many elements of recognized human neurodegenerative disorders in either knock-in or knock-out mice. However, there are similarly, many identifiable environmental influences on outcomes of the genetic defects; and the course of a progressive neurodegenerative disorder can be greatly modified by environmental elements. Constituent cellular defense mechanisms responsive to the challenge of increased reactive oxygen species represent only one crossroad whereby environment can influence genetic predisposition. In this paper we highlight some of the major neurodegenerative disorders and discuss possible links of gene-environment interplay. The process of adult neurogenesis in brain is also presented as an additional element that influences gene-environment interplay. And the so-called priming processes (i.e., production of receptor supersensitization by repeated drug dosing), is introduced as yet another process that influences how genes and environment ultimately and co-dependently govern behavioral ontogeny and outcome. In studies attributing the influence of genetic alteration on behavioral phenotypy, it is essential to carefully control environmental influences.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnimalsAntidepressive AgentsGene ExpressionHumansHuntington DiseaseNervous SystemNeurodegenerative DiseasesAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID15639777

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.