ReviewNeurotoxicity research2004
Gene-environment interplay in neurogenesis and neurodegeneration.
Review in Neurotoxicity research, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Computational Modelling Approaches on Epigenetic Factors in Neurodegenerative and Autoimmune Diseases and Their Mechanistic Analysis.Journal of immunology research · 2015Review
- Molecular mechanisms of pesticide-induced neurotoxicity: Relevance to Parkinson's disease.Chemico-biological interactions · 2010Review
- Affective status in relation to impulsive, motor and motivational symptoms: personality, development and physical exercise.Neurotoxicity research · 2008Article
- Comorbidity implications in brain disease: neuronal substrates of symptom profiles.Neurotoxicity research · 2007Review
- Genetic variation and shared biological susceptibility underlying comorbidity in neuropsychiatry.Neurotoxicity research · 2007Review
- Neurotoxins and neurotoxicity mechanisms. An overview.Neurotoxicity research · 2006Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Factors associated with predisposition and vulnerability to neurodegenerative disorders may be described usefully within the context of gene-environment interplay. There are many identified genetic determinants for so-called genetic disorders, and it is possible to duplicate many elements of recognized human neurodegenerative disorders in either knock-in or knock-out mice. However, there are similarly, many identifiable environmental influences on outcomes of the genetic defects; and the course of a progressive neurodegenerative disorder can be greatly modified by environmental elements. Constituent cellular defense mechanisms responsive to the challenge of increased reactive oxygen species represent only one crossroad whereby environment can influence genetic predisposition. In this paper we highlight some of the major neurodegenerative disorders and discuss possible links of gene-environment interplay. The process of adult neurogenesis in brain is also presented as an additional element that influences gene-environment interplay. And the so-called priming processes (i.e., production of receptor supersensitization by repeated drug dosing), is introduced as yet another process that influences how genes and environment ultimately and co-dependently govern behavioral ontogeny and outcome. In studies attributing the influence of genetic alteration on behavioral phenotypy, it is essential to carefully control environmental influences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
15639777What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.