ArticleRespiratory research2005
Cough quality in children: a comparison of subjective vs. bronchoscopic findings.
Article in Respiratory research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
37 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 143 citations in OpenAlex.
- Antibiotics for prolonged wet cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Clinical pathways for chronic cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2014Pooled it
- [Consensus statement on the evaluation and therapy of chronic cough in children].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2014Guideline
- Anti-histamines for prolonged non-specific cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2008Pooled it
- Leukotriene receptor antagonist for prolonged non-specific cough in children.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2006Pooled it
- Trial
- The respiratory health of urban indigenous children aged less than 5 years: study protocol for a prospective cohort study.BMC pediatrics · 2015Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Expert opinion and clinical practice recommendations using a modified Delphi approach for pediatric acute cough evaluation and management in India.Lung India : official organ of Indian Chest Society · 2026Article
- Pediatric bronchiectasis-the importance of early diagnosis of children across the chronic wet cough spectrum.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Review
- Tracheobronchomalacia is common in children with primary ciliary dyskinesia-A case note review.Pediatric pulmonology · 2024Article
- Controversies in Antibiotic Use for Chronic Wet Cough in Children.The Journal of pediatrics · 2024Article
- Review
- History Taking as a Diagnostic Tool in Children With Chronic Cough.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2022Review
- Airway Malacia: Clinical Features and Surgical Related Issues, a Ten-Year Experience from a Tertiary Pediatric Hospital.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Relationships Between Bronchoscopy, Microbiology, and Radiology in Noncystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis.Pediatric allergy, immunology, and pulmonology · 2021Article
- Prevalence of chronic wet cough and protracted bacterial bronchitis in Aboriginal children.ERJ open research · 2019Article
- 'Dry' and 'wet' cough: how reliable is parental reporting?BMJ open respiratory research · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCough is the most common symptom presenting to doctors. The quality of cough (productive or wet vs dry) is used clinically as well as in epidemiology and clinical research. There is however no data on the validity of cough quality descriptors. The study aims were to compare (1) cough quality (wet/dry and brassy/non-brassy) to bronchoscopic findings of secretions and tracheomalacia respectively and, (2) parent's vs clinician's evaluation of the cough quality (wet/dry).
methodsCough quality of children (without a known underlying respiratory disease) undergoing elective bronchoscopy was independently evaluated by clinicians and parents. A 'blinded' clinician scored the secretions seen at bronchoscopy on pre-determined criteria and graded (1 to 6). Kappa (K) statistics was used for agreement, and inter-rater and intra-rater agreement examined on digitally recorded cough. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to determine if cough quality related to amount of airway secretions present at bronchoscopy.
resultsMedian age of the 106 children (62 boys, 44 girls) enrolled was 2.6 years (IQR 5.7). Parent's assessment of cough quality (wet/dry) agreed with clinicians' (K = 0.75, 95%CI 0.58-0.93). When compared to bronchoscopy (bronchoscopic secretion grade 4), clinicians' cough assessment had the highest sensitivity (0.75) and specificity (0.79) and were marginally better than parent(s). The area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95%CI 0.77-0.92). Intra-observer (K = 1.0) and inter-clinician agreement for wet/dry cough (K = 0.88, 95%CI 0.82-0.94) was very good. Weighted K for inter-rater agreement for bronchoscopic secretion grades was 0.95 (95%CI 0.87-1). Sensitivity and specificity for brassy cough (for tracheomalacia) were 0.57 and 0.81 respectively. K for both intra and inter-observer clinician agreement for brassy cough was 0.79 (95%CI 0.73-0.86).
conclusionsDry and wet cough in children, as determined by clinicians and parents has good clinical validity. Clinicians should however be cognisant that children with dry cough may have minimal to mild airway secretions. Brassy cough determined by respiratory physicians is highly specific for tracheomalacia.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.