ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2005
Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy with curative intent for colon carcinoma.
Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
55 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 94 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Laparoscopic right colectomy reduces short-term mortality and morbidity. Results of a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of colorectal disease · 2015Pooled it
- Laparoscopic colon and rectal resections with intracorporeal anastomosis and trans-vaginal specimen extraction for colorectal cancer. A case series and systematic literature review.International journal of colorectal disease · 2015Pooled it
- Evidence based medicine and surgical approaches for colon cancer: evidences, benefits and limitations of the laparoscopic vs open resection.World journal of gastroenterology · 2014Pooled it
- Transverse skin crease versus vertical midline incision versus laparoscopy for right hemicolectomy: a systematic review--current status of right hemicolectomy.BioMed research international · 2014Pooled it
- Laparoscopic right colectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies comparing two types of anastomosis.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Pooled it
- Has laparoscopic colorectal surgery become more cost-effective over time?International journal of colorectal disease · 2012Pooled it
- Three surgical planes identified in laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision for right-sided colon cancer.World journal of surgical oncology · 2016Trial
- Completely medial versus hybrid medial approach for laparoscopic complete mesocolic excision in right hemicolon cancer.Surgical endoscopy · 2014Trial
- Laparoscopic versus open colectomy for TNM stage III colon cancer: results of a prospective multicenter study in Italy.Surgery today · 2012Trial
- Laparoscopic-assisted versus open resection of right-sided colonic cancer--a prospective randomized controlled trial.International journal of colorectal disease · 2012Trial
- Multiple-, but not single-, dose of parecoxib reduces shoulder pain after gynecologic laparoscopy.International journal of medical sciences · 2012Trial
- Short-term outcomes and the learning curve for laparoscopic right hemicolectomy using the ArtiSential: a multicenter pooled analysis.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Article
- Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis in laparoscopic right colectomy: a retrospective study.World journal of surgical oncology · 2023Article
- Minimally invasive right colectomy with transrectal natural orifice extraction: could this be the next step forward?Techniques in coloproctology · 2020Article
- Right hemicolectomy with D3 lymph node dissection for right-sided transverse colon cancer using the Senhance robotic system: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2020Article
- Article
- Initial experience of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with complete mesocolic excision in Singapore: a case series.Singapore medical journal · 2019Article
- Transanal versus transabdominal specimen extraction in laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: a retrospective analysis from China.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2019Article
- Completely medial access by page-turning approach for laparoscopic right hemi-colectomy: 6-year-experience in single center.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimLaparoscopic surgery, especially laparoscopic rectal surgery, for colorectal cancer has been developed considerably. However, due to relatively complicated anatomy and high requirements for surgery techniques, laparoscopic right colectomy develops relatively slowly. This study was designed to compare the outcomes of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy (LRH) with open right hemicolectomy (ORH) in the treatment of colon carcinoma.
methodsBetween September 2000 and February 2003, 30 patients with colon cancer who underwent LRH were compared with 34 controls treated by ORH in the same period. All patients were evaluated with respect to surgery-related complications, postoperative recovery, recurrence and metastasis rate, cost-effectiveness and survival.
resultsAmong 30 LRH, 2 (6.7%) were converted to open procedure. No significant differences were observed in terms of mean operation time, blood loss, post-operative complications, and hospital cost between LRH and ORH groups. Mean time for bowel movement, hospital stay, and time to resume early activity in the LRH group were significantly shorter than those in the ORH group (2.24+/-0.56 vs 3.25+/-1.29 d, 13.94+/-6.5 vs 18.25+/-5.96 d, 3.94+/-1.64 vs 5.45+/-1.82 d respectively, P<0.05). As to the lymph node yield, the specimen length and total cost for operation and drugs, there was no significant difference between the two groups. Local recurrence rate and metachronous metastasis rate had no marked difference between the two groups. Cumulative survival probability at 40 mo in LRH group (76.50%) was not obviously different compared to the ORH group (74.04%).
conclusionLRH in patients with colon cancer has statistically and clinically significant advantages over ORH. Thus, LRH can be regarded as a safe and effective procedure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.