Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15634955›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2005

Sensitivities and specificities of spoligotyping and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat typing methods for studying molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis.

Allison N Scott, Dick Menzies, Terry-Nan Tannenbaum, Louise Thibert, Robert Kozak, Lawrence Joseph, Kevin Schwartzman, Marcel A Behr

Abstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. A Comprehensive Evaluation of GeneLEAD VIII DNA Platform Combined to Deeplex Myc-TBFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Article
  3. Exploring the usefulness of molecular epidemiology of tuberculosis in Africa: a systematic review.International journal of molecular epidemiology and genetics · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Whole-genome sequencing in outbreak analysis.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2015
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Molecular typing of Mycobacterium bovis isolates: a review.Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2014
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Allison N ScottDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Dick Menzies
Terry-Nan Tannenbaum
Louise Thibert
Robert Kozak
Lawrence Joseph
Kevin Schwartzman
Marcel A Behr

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of PCR-based genotyping modalities (spoligotyping and mycobacterial interspersed repetitive unit-variable-number tandem repeat [MIRU-VNTR] typing) offers promise for real-time molecular epidemiological studies of tuberculosis (TB). However, the utility of these methods depends on their capacity to appropriately classify isolates. To determine the operating parameters of spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing, we have compared results generated by these newer tests to the standard typing method, IS6110 restriction fragment length polymorphism, in analyses restricted to high-copy-number IS6110 isolates. Sensitivities of the newer tests were estimated as the percentages of isolates with identical IS6110 fingerprints that had identical spoligotypes and MIRU-VNTR types. The specificities of these tests were estimated as the percentages of isolates with unique IS6110 fingerprints that had unique spoligotypes and MIRU-VNTR types. The sensitivity of MIRU-VNTR typing was 52% (95% confidence interval [CI], 31 to 72%), and the sensitivity of spoligotyping was 83% (95% CI, 63 to 95%). The specificity of MIRU-VNTR typing was 56% (95% CI, 51 to 62%), and the specificity of spoligotyping was 40% (95% CI, 35 to 46%). The proportion of isolates estimated to be due to recent transmission was 4% by identical IS6110 patterns, 19% by near-identical IS6110 patterns, 33% by MIRU-VNTR typing, and 53% by spoligotyping. The low calculated specificities of spoligotyping and MIRU-VNTR typing led to misclassification of cases, inflated estimates of TB transmission, and low positive predictive values, suggesting that these techniques have unsuitable operating parameters for population-based molecular epidemiology studies.

Indexed as

Molecular EpidemiologyBacterial Typing TechniquesDNA Transposable ElementsHumansInterspersed Repetitive SequencesMinisatellite RepeatsMycobacterium tuberculosisOligonucleotidesPolymorphism, Restriction Fragment LengthSensitivity and SpecificityTuberculosisDNA Transposable ElementsOligonucleotides

Identifiers

PMID15634955
PMCPMC540143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.