ArticleJournal of the Royal Society of Medicine2005
The surgical assessment unit--effective strategy for improvement of the emergency surgical pathway?
Article in Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The Accuracy of Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) in Acute Gallbladder Disease.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- LEARN: A multi-centre, cross-sectional evaluation of Urology teaching in UK medical schools.BJU international · 2022Article
- A systematic review of dedicated models of care for emergency urological patients.Asian journal of urology · 2021Review
- Hybrid Surgical Hot Clinic (HSHC): Evaluation of Surgical Hot Clinic Services during COVID-19 Lockdown.World journal of surgery · 2021Article
- Magnitude of non-operative surgical emergency admissions; service implications for surgical and radiological practice.Irish journal of medical science · 2017Article
- Patient satisfaction following emergency admission via a surgical assessment unit and an emergency department.Irish journal of medical science · 2013Article
- The dedicated emergency surgeon: towards consultant-based acute surgical admissions.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2008Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A special unit was set up in an associate teaching hospital to provide a fast-track route for the assessment of acute adult surgical and urological referrals. During an audit period of eight weeks, this surgical assessment unit had 550 referrals, of which 196 (36%) came via the accident and emergency (A&E) department; the other 354 came directly from general practitioners or other hospital departments. Mondays, Tuesdays and Fridays were the busiest days of the week; 57% of all patients arrived between 8 am and 5 pm. 68% were seen by a doctor within 1 hour of their arrival. 68% were either discharged or admitted to the main surgical wards within 4 hours. The study showed that, over the course of a year, the surgical assessment unit might divert some 2301 patients away from the A&E department. To achieve this total it would need to be open and appropriately staffed 24 hours a day. Such a unit offers a strategy for limiting the A&E workload and streamlining the assessment of patients with surgical and urological emergencies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.