Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15632085›Full record

ArticleGenome research2005

Comparative genome sequencing of Drosophila pseudoobscura: chromosomal, gene, and cis-element evolution.

Stephen Richards, Yue Liu, Brian R Bettencourt, Pavel Hradecky, Stan Letovsky, Rasmus Nielsen, Kevin Thornton, Melissa J Hubisz, Rui Chen, Richard P Meisel and 42 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 300 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
300citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

300 citing papers in PubMed, 508 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Response of fruit fly (Physiological entomology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Comparative Genome Annotation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  18. Article
  19. The relevance of chromatin architecture to genome rearrangements inPhilosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2022
    Article
  20. Article

240 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

52 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephen RichardsHuman Genome Sequencing Center and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston Texas 77030, USA. stephenr@bcm.tmc.edu
Yue Liu
Brian R Bettencourt
Pavel Hradecky
Stan Letovsky
Rasmus Nielsen
Kevin Thornton
Melissa J Hubisz
Rui Chen
Richard P Meisel
Olivier Couronne
Sujun Hua
Mark A Smith
Peili Zhang
Jing Liu
Harmen J Bussemaker
Marinus F van Batenburg
Sally L Howells
Steven E Scherer
Erica Sodergren
Beverly B Matthews
Madeline A Crosby
Andrew J Schroeder
Daniel Ortiz-Barrientos
Catharine M Rives
Michael L Metzker
Donna M Muzny
Graham Scott
David Steffen
David A Wheeler
Kim C Worley
Paul Havlak
K James Durbin
Rain Simons
Rachel Gill
Jennifer Hume
Margaret B Morgan
George Miner
Cerissa Hamilton
Yanmei Huang
Lenée Waldron
Daniel Verduzco
Kerstin P Clerc-Blankenburg
Inna Dubchak
Mohamed A F Noor
Wyatt Anderson
Kevin P White
Andrew G Clark
Stephen W Schaeffer
William Gelbart
George M Weinstock
Richard A Gibbs
Baylor College of Medicine · USHarvard University · USCornell University · USLouisiana State University · USPennsylvania State University · USYale University · USColumbia University · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USNetherlands Institute for Neuroscience · NLUnited States Department of Energy · USUniversity of Georgia · US

Funding

FLYBASE: A DROSOPHILA RELATIONAL DATABASEP41HG000739 · NHGRI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI GELBART, WILLIAM MARTIN · 1992 to 2014
$56.6M
Sequencing, assembly and annotation of a second Drosoph*U01HG002570 · NHGRI · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI GIBBS, RICHARD A · 2002 to 2002
$5.0M
PATTERN FORMATION AND GENE ORGANIZATION IN DROSOPHILAR37GM028669 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI GELBART, WILLIAM MARTIN · 1995 to 2004
$2.5M
Center for Computational Biology and BioinformaticsP20LM007276 · NLM · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI HONIG, BARRY H · 2001 to 2003
$2.1M
Molecular Evolution of Drosophila Y ChromosomeR01GM064590 · NIGMS · PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY-UNIV PARK · PI CARVALHO, ANTONIO BERNARDO, CLARK, ANDREW G · 2002 to 2012
$2.0M
SUPPRESSING HIV INFECTION IN EXPOSED SERONEGATIVE ADULTSR01AI045402 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI ZHU, TUOFU · 1999 to 2003
$873k
NHGRI NIH HHS 1U01 HG02570NHGRI NIH HHS 5 P41 HG00739NHGRI NIH HHS P41 HG000739NIAID NIH HHS AI-45402NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI045402NIGMS NIH HHS 5 R37 GM28669NIGMS NIH HHS GM-64590NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM064590NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM028669NLM NIH HHS LM007276NLM NIH HHS P20 LM007276
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have sequenced the genome of a second Drosophila species, Drosophila pseudoobscura, and compared this to the genome sequence of Drosophila melanogaster, a primary model organism. Throughout evolution the vast majority of Drosophila genes have remained on the same chromosome arm, but within each arm gene order has been extensively reshuffled, leading to a minimum of 921 syntenic blocks shared between the species. A repetitive sequence is found in the D. pseudoobscura genome at many junctions between adjacent syntenic blocks. Analysis of this novel repetitive element family suggests that recombination between offset elements may have given rise to many paracentric inversions, thereby contributing to the shuffling of gene order in the D. pseudoobscura lineage. Based on sequence similarity and synteny, 10,516 putative orthologs have been identified as a core gene set conserved over 25-55 million years (Myr) since the pseudoobscura/melanogaster divergence. Genes expressed in the testes had higher amino acid sequence divergence than the genome-wide average, consistent with the rapid evolution of sex-specific proteins. Cis-regulatory sequences are more conserved than random and nearby sequences between the species--but the difference is slight, suggesting that the evolution of cis-regulatory elements is flexible. Overall, a pattern of repeat-mediated chromosomal rearrangement, and high coadaptation of both male genes and cis-regulatory sequences emerges as important themes of genome divergence between these species of Drosophila.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeAnimalsChromosome BreakageChromosome InversionChromosome MappingChromosomesConserved SequenceDrosophilaDrosophila melanogasterEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene RearrangementGenes, InsectGenetic VariationMolecular Sequence DataPredictive Value of Tests

Identifiers

PMID15632085
PMCPMC540289
OpenAlexW2115806022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.