ReviewDrugs2005
Infections associated with medical devices: pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis.
Review in Drugs, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 448 citations in OpenAlex.
- Resorbable Bio-Inductive Collagen Implant for Rotator Cuff Repair: What We Know, What We Need to Know, and the Path Forward.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Pooled it
- A systematic review and meta-analyses show that carbapenem use and medical devices are the leading risk factors for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2014Pooled it
- Biofilm Formation on Invasive Medical Devices in Adult Intensive Care Units: A Scoping Review of Biomedical and Clinical Evidence.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Combinatorial Design of Slippery, Nitric Oxide-Releasing Surfaces Incorporating Copper Nanoparticles for Blood-Contacting Devices.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
- Biofilm Formation on Indwelling Medical Devices: A Review of Health and Economic Implications.International journal of microbiology · 2026Review
- Clarifying the Dual Role ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biohacking and Chip Implantation in the Human Hand: An Introduction.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2025Review
- Pharmacodynamics of Vancomycin Against Coagulase-Negative Staphylococci Bloodstream Infections.Pharmacology research & perspectives · 2025Review
- Development of Biomimetic Gelatin-Hydroxyapatite Composites Containing Doxycycline with Osteogenic Potential.ACS applied bio materials · 2025Article
- Healthcare-associated infections.GMS hygiene and infection control · 2025Review
- Cationic homopolypeptides: A versatile tool to design multifunctional antimicrobial nanocoatings.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Incidence ofOpen forum infectious diseases · 2024Article
- Biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus on various implants used for surgical treatment of destructive spondylodiscitis.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Biohacking and Chip Implantation in the Human Hand: An Introduction.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2024Review
- Three-Dimensional Melted Electrowriting Drug Coating Fibers for the Prevention of Device-Associated Infections: A Pilot Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern among Clinically IsolatedJournal of pathogens · 2024Article
- Meshing around: high-risk hernias and infected mesh.Trauma surgery & acute care open · 2024Review
- Vancomycin-Loaded 3D-Printed Polylactic Acid-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Polymers · 2023Article
- Microbial Biofilm: A Review on Formation, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Control Measures, and Innovative Treatment.Microorganisms · 2023Review
- Zinc chloride is effective as an antibiotic in biofilm prevention following septoplasty.Scientific reports · 2023Article
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The insertion or implantation of foreign bodies has become an indispensable part in almost all fields of medicine. However, medical devices are associated with a definitive risk of bacterial and fungal infections. Foreign body-related infections (FBRIs), particularly catheter-related infections, significantly contribute to the increasing problem of nosocomial infections. While a variety of micro-organisms may be involved as pathogens, staphylococci account for the majority of FBRIs. Their ability to adhere to materials and to promote formation of a biofilm is the most important feature of their pathogenicity. This biofilm on the surface of colonised foreign bodies is regarded as the biological correlative for the clinical experience with FBRI, that is, that the host defence mechanisms often seem to be unable to handle the infection and, in particular, to eliminate the micro-organisms from the infected device. Since antibacterial chemotherapy is also frequently not able to cure these infections despite the use of antibacterials with proven in vitro activity, removal of implanted devices is often inevitable and has been standard clinical practice. However, in specific circumstances, such as infections of implanted medical devices with coagulase-negative staphylococci, a trial of salvage of the device may be justified. All FBRIs should be treated with antibacterials to which the pathogens have been shown to be susceptible. In addition to systemic antibacterial therapy, an intraluminal application of antibacterial agents, referred to as the 'antibiotic-lock' technique, should be considered to circumvent the need for removal, especially in patients with implanted long-term catheters. To reduce the incidence of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infections, specific guidelines comprising both technological and nontechnological strategies for prevention have been established. Quality assurance, continuing education, choice of the catheter insertion site, hand hygiene and aseptic techniques are aspects of particular interest. Furthermore, all steps in the pathogenesis of biofilm formation may represent targets against which prevention strategies may be directed. Alteration of the foreign body material surface may lead to a change in specific and nonspecific interactions with micro-organisms and, thus, to a reduced microbial adherence. Medical devices made out of a material that would be antiadhesive or at least colonisation resistant would be the most suitable candidates to avoid colonisation and subsequent infection. Another concept for the prevention of FBRIs involves the impregnation of devices with various substances such as antibacterials, antiseptics and/or metals. Finally, further studies are needed to translate the knowledge on the mechanisms of biofilm formation into applicable therapeutic and preventive strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.