ArticleClinical and experimental immunology1992
Specific recognition pattern of IgM and IgG antibodies produced in the course of experimental paracoccidioidomycosis.
Article in Clinical and experimental immunology, 1992. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Temporal evolution of human autoantibody response to cytoplasmic rods and rings structure during anti-HCV therapy with ribavirin and interferon-α.Immunologic research · 2014Article
- Delayed-type hypersensitivity response in an isogenic murine model of paracoccidioidomycosis.Mycopathologia · 1994Article
- Immunological response to cell-free antigens of Paracoccidioides brasiliensis: relationship with clinical forms of paracoccidioidomycosis.Journal of clinical microbiology · 1993Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Specific IgM and IgG responses to Paracoccidioides brasiliensis produced in resistant and susceptible mice during experimental paracoccidioidomycosis were examined by the immunoblotting procedure. Sera from infected mice recognized 51 antigen bands with apparent molecular masses from 8 to 86 kD. Sixteen of these were defined as major antigen bands because of almost universal presence of antibodies to them, and their intense staining. All sera, including those from normal control mice, tested for both IgM and IgG antibody reacted with the major E antigen which appeared as a large diffuse band from 43 to 47 kD. Comparisons between resistant and susceptible mice showed some significant differences in IgM responses to many antigen bands. While IgG responses were quite similar for both strains, differences were apparent in the response to the antigens at 62 and 68 kD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.