Evidence map›Paper›PMID 15630479›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2005

Highly conserved non-coding sequences are associated with vertebrate development.

Adam Woolfe, Martin Goodson, Debbie K Goode, Phil Snell, Gayle K McEwen, Tanya Vavouri, Sarah F Smith, Phil North, Heather Callaway, Krys Kelly and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2005. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 482 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
482citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

482 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A putativebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Min-frame transformation enables more sensitive viral genome alignment.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

422 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Adam WoolfeMedical Research Council Rosalind Franklin Centre for Genomics Research Hinxton, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
Martin Goodson
Debbie K Goode
Phil Snell
Gayle K McEwen
Tanya Vavouri
Sarah F Smith
Phil North
Heather Callaway
Krys Kelly
Klaudia Walter
Irina Abnizova
Walter Gilks
Yvonne J K Edwards
Julie E Cooke
Greg Elgar

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to protein coding sequence, the human genome contains a significant amount of regulatory DNA, the identification of which is proving somewhat recalcitrant to both in silico and functional methods. An approach that has been used with some success is comparative sequence analysis, whereby equivalent genomic regions from different organisms are compared in order to identify both similarities and differences. In general, similarities in sequence between highly divergent organisms imply functional constraint. We have used a whole-genome comparison between humans and the pufferfish, Fugu rubripes, to identify nearly 1,400 highly conserved non-coding sequences. Given the evolutionary divergence between these species, it is likely that these sequences are found in, and furthermore are essential to, all vertebrates. Most, and possibly all, of these sequences are located in and around genes that act as developmental regulators. Some of these sequences are over 90% identical across more than 500 bases, being more highly conserved than coding sequence between these two species. Despite this, we cannot find any similar sequences in invertebrate genomes. In order to begin to functionally test this set of sequences, we have used a rapid in vivo assay system using zebrafish embryos that allows tissue-specific enhancer activity to be identified. Functional data is presented for highly conserved non-coding sequences associated with four unrelated developmental regulators (SOX21, PAX6, HLXB9, and SHH), in order to demonstrate the suitability of this screen to a wide range of genes and expression patterns. Of 25 sequence elements tested around these four genes, 23 show significant enhancer activity in one or more tissues. We have identified a set of non-coding sequences that are highly conserved throughout vertebrates. They are found in clusters across the human genome, principally around genes that are implicated in the regulation of development, including many transcription factors. These highly conserved non-coding sequences are likely to form part of the genomic circuitry that uniquely defines vertebrate development.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenome, HumanRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidAnimalsConserved SequenceDatabases, GeneticEnhancer Elements, GeneticEye ProteinsGenomeGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsHumansMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyEye ProteinsGreen Fluorescent ProteinsHedgehog ProteinsHigh Mobility Group ProteinsHomeodomain ProteinsMNX1 protein, humanNeoplasm ProteinsPaired Box Transcription FactorsPAX6 protein, humanPAX6 Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsSHH protein, humanSOX21 protein, humanSOXB2 Transcription FactorsTrans-ActivatorsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID15630479
PMCPMC526512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.